Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="The_Sage, post: 1463405"] Reply to article by: [email]belvis@pacbell.net[/email] (Bob Bell) The subject of the sentence above is "return type", therefore the when "type" is mentioned the second time, it clearly is still talking about return type...what other "type" would they be talking about? Please explain. The non-return type? We're they talking about another type from some other sentence in some other chapter and paragraph a few pages back? You stand corrected. Your mistake is commenting on something that proves your ignorance when if you had only kept your mouth shut, we wouldn't have known if you were ignorant or not. The Sage ============================================================= My Home Page : [URL]http://members.cox.net/the.sage[/URL] "The biggest problem in the world, could have been solved when it was small..." -- Lao Tzu ============================================================= [/QUOTE]