Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Martin Ambuhl, post: 1700386"] MSG wrote: The use of malloc is idiomatic C, understood and read by any C programmer. It is just silly to claim that your non-idiomatic stuff is "more readable." It is _less_ readable to any C programmer. This is just stupid. Writing it as double *y = malloc(1000 * sizeof *y); solves this problem without introducing your NEW layer of obfuscation. No solution exists to mindless copy-and-paste. Introducing a non-idiomatic layer on top of C will not help. If your definition of "win" is introducing non-idiomatic obfuscating layers which solve nothing. Your "solution" is a quadruple loser. [/QUOTE]