Unit test filename convention

[Manlio Malaidini]

All,

I'm just starting with Netbeans 6.1 after having used Eclipse RDT for a
while. I was used to keep unit tests within the same file (delimited by
if $0 == __FILE__), but now I guess there's a shift towards separate
files.

Which is the current trend in the community for what is related to unit
tests filename? I've never bought into the TC_* style, it's ugly and
fairly disruptive. What about yada_test.rb for class Yada defined in
yada.rb?

Thanks
MM

 

[Eric Hodel]

All,

I'm just starting with Netbeans 6.1 after having used Eclipse RDT
for a
while. I was used to keep unit tests within the same file (delimited
by
if $0 == __FILE__), but now I guess there's a shift towards separate
files.

Which is the current trend in the community for what is related to
unit
tests filename? I've never bought into the TC_* style, it's ugly and
fairly disruptive. What about yada_test.rb for class Yada defined in
yada.rb?

lib/yada.rb # class/module Yada
test/test_yada.rb # class TestYada < Test::Unit::TestCase

(Which works out-of-the-box with autotest, but since you're using
Eclipse, you probably don't care.)

 

[Manlio Malaidini]

lib/yada.rb # class/module Yada
test/test_yada.rb # class TestYada < Test::Unit::TestCase

It makes perfect sense, thank you.

(Which works out-of-the-box with autotest, but since you're using
Eclipse, you probably don't care.)

I've just switched to Netbeans. So far so good. Well, much better to be
honest.

Thanks
MM

 

[mmalaidini]

Something strange: I haven't seen your response in neither ruby-
talk.org or ruby-forum. I guess you posted from comp.lang.ruby.

So the question is: what's the status of the bridge?

Thanks
MM

[...]