URLs

[FluxForums]

*Relative vs. Absolute URLs
URLs within HTML documents can take two forms, *absolute* (or full) an
*relative* (or partial).
An *absolute URL* is a full pathname which completely defines how t
reach a referenced file, regardless of where the file is reference
from. An example of an absolute URL is:
<A HREF=http://tinyurl.com/2zryc>Sample Page</A>
A *relative URL* gives only the amount of information necessary to fil
a referenced file relative to the location of the current file. A
example of a relative URL is:
<A HREF="sample.html">Sample Page</A> The difference between the two i
that the absolute URL above could be used to access the Sample pag
from anywhere in the world -- it gives complete access informatio
which will always work. The relative URL shown would only work i
called from another document already in th
*'www.yourwebsite.com/test/' (http://tinyurl.com/3ewud)* directory

 

[SpaceGirl]

*Relative vs. Absolute URLs*
URLs within HTML documents can take two forms, *absolute* (or full) and
*relative* (or partial).
An *absolute URL* is a full pathname which completely defines how to
reach a referenced file, regardless of where the file is referenced
from. An example of an absolute URL is:
<A HREF=http://tinyurl.com/2zryc>Sample Page</A>
A *relative URL* gives only the amount of information necessary to file
a referenced file relative to the location of the current file. An
example of a relative URL is:
<A HREF="sample.html">Sample Page</A> The difference between the two is
that the absolute URL above could be used to access the Sample page
from anywhere in the world -- it gives complete access information
which will always work. The relative URL shown would only work if
called from another document already in the
*'www.yourwebsite.com/test/' (http://tinyurl.com/3ewud)* directory.

http://whatever.com/?dothis

also a valid url, but not a page, or even a real location...

 

[Jukka K. Korpela]

*Relative vs. Absolute URLs*

Yes? Your message headers claim that you have sent a one-liner, but the
message contains some more lines. We don't see any question, or
anything that would clarify anything, just something that looks like a
half-baked attempt at explaining the difference. Without the poster's
name - always a useful bogosity warning.

Is FluxForum a new contestant in the competition of creating the most
useless, confusing, and misleading "discussion forum" that presents
Usenet as being part of it?

 

[Cameron]

Yes? Your message headers claim that you have sent a one-liner, but the
message contains some more lines. We don't see any question, or
anything that would clarify anything, just something that looks like a
half-baked attempt at explaining the difference. Without the poster's
name - always a useful bogosity warning.

Is FluxForum a new contestant in the competition of creating the most
useless, confusing, and misleading "discussion forum" that presents
Usenet as being part of it?

Uhm actually headers say that she sent 27 lines (Below)

~Cameron

Path:
news.theplanet.net!diablo.theplanet.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!82-41-20-93.cable.ubr03.edin.blueyonder.co.UK!not-for-mail
From: "SpaceGirl" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: alt.html
Subject: Re: URLs
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 10:15:27 -0000
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82-41-20-93.cable.ubr03.edin.blueyonder.co.uk
(82.41.20.93)
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1077445050 50211573 I 82.41.20.93 ([129131])
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Xref: news.theplanet.net alt.html:381830

 

[SpaceGirl]

Yes? Your message headers claim that you have sent a one-liner, but the
message contains some more lines. We don't see any question, or
anything that would clarify anything, just something that looks like a
half-baked attempt at explaining the difference. Without the poster's
name - always a useful bogosity warning.

Is FluxForum a new contestant in the competition of creating the most
useless, confusing, and misleading "discussion forum" that presents
Usenet as being part of it?

Uhm actually headers say that she sent 27 lines (Below)

~Cameron

Path:
news.theplanet.net!diablo.theplanet.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed0
1.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!82-41-20-93.cable.u
br03.edin.blueyonder.co.UK!not-for-mail
From: "SpaceGirl" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: alt.html
Subject: Re: URLs
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 10:15:27 -0000
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82-41-20-93.cable.ubr03.edin.blueyonder.co.uk
(82.41.20.93)
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1077445050 50211573 I 82.41.20.93 ([129131])
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Xref: news.theplanet.net alt.html:381830

It's rude to expose a ladys headers without asking

 

[Els]

Yes? Your message headers claim that you have sent a one-liner, but
the message contains some more lines. We don't see any question, or
anything that would clarify anything, just something that looks like a
half-baked attempt at explaining the difference. Without the poster's
name - always a useful bogosity warning.

Is FluxForum a new contestant in the competition of creating the most
useless, confusing, and misleading "discussion forum" that presents
Usenet as being part of it?

Uhm actually headers say that she sent 27 lines (Below)

~Cameron

Path:
news.theplanet.net!diablo.theplanet.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!82-41-20-93.cable.ubr03.edin.blueyonder.co.UK!not-for-mail

From: "SpaceGirl" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: alt.html
Subject: Re: URLs
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 10:15:27 -0000
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82-41-20-93.cable.ubr03.edin.blueyonder.co.uk
(82.41.20.93)
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1077445050 50211573 I 82.41.20.93 ([129131])
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Xref: news.theplanet.net alt.html:381830

That's SpaceGirl's header.
Jukka was responding to FluxForums... 1 line indeed.

 

[Cameron]

*Relative vs. Absolute URLs*




Yes? Your message headers claim that you have sent a one-liner, but
the message contains some more lines. We don't see any question, or
anything that would clarify anything, just something that looks like
a half-baked attempt at explaining the difference. Without the
poster's name - always a useful bogosity warning.

Is FluxForum a new contestant in the competition of creating the most
useless, confusing, and misleading "discussion forum" that presents
Usenet as being part of it?

Uhm actually headers say that she sent 27 lines (Below)

~Cameron

Path:
news.theplanet.net!diablo.theplanet.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!82-41-20-93.cable.ubr03.edin.blueyonder.co.UK!not-for-mail

From: "SpaceGirl" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: alt.html
Subject: Re: URLs
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 10:15:27 -0000
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82-41-20-93.cable.ubr03.edin.blueyonder.co.uk
(82.41.20.93)
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1077445050 50211573 I 82.41.20.93 ([129131])
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Xref: news.theplanet.net alt.html:381830

That's SpaceGirl's header.
Jukka was responding to FluxForums... 1 line indeed.

Euh, then either Mozilla Thunderbird messed up the thread or Jukka
replied to the wrong one.

~Cameron

 

[Cameron]

*Relative vs. Absolute URLs*


Yes? Your message headers claim that you have sent a one-liner, but the
message contains some more lines. We don't see any question, or
anything that would clarify anything, just something that looks like a
half-baked attempt at explaining the difference. Without the poster's
name - always a useful bogosity warning.

Is FluxForum a new contestant in the competition of creating the most
useless, confusing, and misleading "discussion forum" that presents
Usenet as being part of it?

Uhm actually headers say that she sent 27 lines (Below)

~Cameron

Path:

news.theplanet.net!diablo.theplanet.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed0
1.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!82-41-20-93.cable.u
br03.edin.blueyonder.co.UK!not-for-mail

From: "SpaceGirl" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: alt.html
Subject: Re: URLs
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 10:15:27 -0000
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82-41-20-93.cable.ubr03.edin.blueyonder.co.uk
(82.41.20.93)
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1077445050 50211573 I 82.41.20.93 ([129131])
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Xref: news.theplanet.net alt.html:381830

It's rude to expose a ladys headers without asking

hey, at least I didn't go Henry The Eighth on them

~Cameron

 

[Els]

Euh, then either Mozilla Thunderbird messed up the thread or Jukka
replied to the wrong one.

Must be the first, as you can see by his quote that Jukka
replied to Fluxforums, not SpaceGirl

 

[Cameron]

Must be the first, as you can see by his quote that Jukka replied to
Fluxforums, not SpaceGirl

Erk, well reluctant to blame my beloved Thunderbird I will blame
freeserve for expiring articles to quickly

~Cameron