Use a string a object name

[Dirk Einecke]

Hi.

I've a little problem. How can I use a string use as an object name?

That works well:
puts p.name # -> dirk

But how can I use the string s as object name, I tried eval but I the
result is not good. Where is my mistake. Can anybody help me?

s = 'name'
puts eval "p.s"

greetings
Dirk Einecke

 

[Jeff Mitchell]

Hi.

I've a little problem. How can I use a string use as an object name?

That works well:
puts p.name # -> dirk

But how can I use the string s as object name, I tried eval but I the
result is not good. Where is my mistake. Can anybody help me?

s = 'name'
puts eval "p.s"

Did you mean,
puts eval "p s" # => "name"





__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/

 

[Mark Sparshatt]

Hi.

I've a little problem. How can I use a string use as an object name?

That works well:
puts p.name # -> dirk

But how can I use the string s as object name, I tried eval but I the
result is not good. Where is my mistake. Can anybody help me?

s = 'name'
puts eval "p.s"

since you want to put the value of s into the string that get's evaled
you need to enclose it in #{ } like this

puts eval "p.#{s}"

Though depending on what you're doing a better way might be to use the
send method

puts p.send(s)

 

[Marek Janukowicz]

I've a little problem. How can I use a string use as an object name?

That works well:
puts p.name # -> dirk

But how can I use the string s as object name, I tried eval but I the
result is not good. Where is my mistake. Can anybody help me?

s = 'name'
puts eval "p.s"

puts eval "p.#{s}"

 

[Dirk Einecke]

Did you mean,
puts eval "p s" # => "name"

Not really...
Okay. From the scratch. I've a class to map a get params to local vars:

class CgiParamsToLocal
def initialize(params)
@params = params
end
def method_missing(m, *other)
@params[m.to_s][0]
end
end

p = CgiParamsToLocal.new($cgi.params)

Now I try to use a string as a object name like I wrote in my first posting.

greetings
Dirk Einecke

 

[Hal Fulton]

puts eval "p.#{s}"

The 'send' method (as Mark said) is the better way
to do this.


Hal

 

[Dirk Einecke]

Hi.

puts eval "p.#{s}"

Okay. That works.

greetings
Dirk Einecke

 

[Dirk Einecke]

puts eval "p.#{s}"

Okay. That works.

Though depending on what you're doing a better way might be to use the
send method

puts p.send(s)

Why is this a better way?

greetings
Dirk Einecke

 

[Mark Sparshatt]

Okay. That works.



Why is this a better way?

It's quicker since Ruby doesn't need to parse the expression string.

Also, IMHO, it better expresses the fact that you're sending the message
contained in s to the object p.

 

[Mark Sparshatt]

It's quicker since Ruby doesn't need to parse the expression string.

Also, IMHO, it better expresses the fact that you're sending the
message contained in s to the object p.

I forgot to mention there are using security concerns with using eval.
If s is taken from an external source then it's possible for someone to
set it to

"send('system', 'rm -rf /')"

which would very quickly ruin your day.