N
Nik Coughin
OK this code is very messy (validates though) and will be cleaned up, but:
http://www.nrkn.com/carters/v3/
This page is supposed to print OK as well. Problem... a white image on a
transparent background, doesn't look good when printed -- all you see is
where the white image antialiases to red. So I had to substitute another
image for printing. So what I did was, I hid the print image in the normal
stylesheet, and gave its container a background image that I knew wouldn't
print. This means that when you have CSS disabled you only see the print
image, which is actually a good thing.
Still, it feels a bit clumsy. Anyone know of a more elegant way of doing
this, or is this pretty much it?
--
"Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million
typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!" - Blair Houghton
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
http://www.nrkn.com/
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
http://www.nrkn.com/carters/v3/
This page is supposed to print OK as well. Problem... a white image on a
transparent background, doesn't look good when printed -- all you see is
where the white image antialiases to red. So I had to substitute another
image for printing. So what I did was, I hid the print image in the normal
stylesheet, and gave its container a background image that I knew wouldn't
print. This means that when you have CSS disabled you only see the print
image, which is actually a good thing.
Still, it feels a bit clumsy. Anyone know of a more elegant way of doing
this, or is this pretty much it?
--
"Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million
typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!" - Blair Houghton
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
http://www.nrkn.com/
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-