G
Guest
I'm testing Visual Studio 2005 for design of pages that are XHTML 1.1 Strict
compliant and have found a few problems. Wondering if anyone can suggest a
workaround or if it is an issue Microsoft will be correcting.
First, My page <head> tag has the runat="server" attribute, and any <link>
tags within it do not render the tag as auto-closing ( <tag /> ). In my
source, I did write it as an auto-closing tag, and if I remove the
runat="server" it renders correctly.
Second, in the properties window (when I am located in the document
section), I am able to add only 1 Stylesheet, whereas I know xhtml supports
more than one. I have to manaully add any additional <link> tags for the
additional stylesheets.
Lastly, the <form> tag (when runat="server") renders a name attribute, which
is not valid in xhtml 1.1 strict. javascripting should be using the id
attribute instead.
Neither the 1st or second problems show as an error or warning in Visual
Studio's build in validator (which is set to validate xhtml 1.1 strict). But
I found them using w3.org's html validator.
Any comments would be appreciated.
compliant and have found a few problems. Wondering if anyone can suggest a
workaround or if it is an issue Microsoft will be correcting.
First, My page <head> tag has the runat="server" attribute, and any <link>
tags within it do not render the tag as auto-closing ( <tag /> ). In my
source, I did write it as an auto-closing tag, and if I remove the
runat="server" it renders correctly.
Second, in the properties window (when I am located in the document
section), I am able to add only 1 Stylesheet, whereas I know xhtml supports
more than one. I have to manaully add any additional <link> tags for the
additional stylesheets.
Lastly, the <form> tag (when runat="server") renders a name attribute, which
is not valid in xhtml 1.1 strict. javascripting should be using the id
attribute instead.
Neither the 1st or second problems show as an error or warning in Visual
Studio's build in validator (which is set to validate xhtml 1.1 strict). But
I found them using w3.org's html validator.
Any comments would be appreciated.