what is the output?

[vinay kumar]

main()
{
int d=010;
printf("%d",d);
}

 

[osmium]

main()
{
int d=010;
printf("%d",d);
}

A leading zero indicates octal.

 

[Geoff]

main()
{
int d=010;
printf("%d",d);
}

int main(void)
{
int d = 010;
printf("%d", d);
}

This sounds like an interview question or a homework problem.
What do you think the output is? Did you compile and run it?

 

[Joe Pfeiffer]

main()
{
int d=010;
printf("%d",d);
}

I don't want to be too rude, but you could compile and run it and find
the output for yourself much faster than you can expect an answer here.

 

[Hans Vlems]

I don't want to be too rude, but you could compile and run it and find
the output for yourself much faster than you can expect an answer here.

My guess is that the OP did do that. And it failed to compile because
printf
wasn't defined. If the OP had managed to find the answer to that in
his textbook then the
question would never have arrived here.
I seriously doubt the OP is interested in niceties as main() vs.
main(void) or int main(void).
Hans

 

[Dr Nick]

My guess is that the OP did do that. And it failed to compile because
printf
wasn't defined. If the OP had managed to find the answer to that in
his textbook then the
question would never have arrived here.
I seriously doubt the OP is interested in niceties as main() vs.
main(void) or int main(void).

My guess is he didn't. My guess is it's our resident troll again.
Let's count shall we:

no #includes
no type for main
no void
no trailing newline on printf
no return from main

5 out of 5.

That's ignoring the actual problem of course.

 

[Joe Pfeiffer]

My guess is that the OP did do that. And it failed to compile because
printf
wasn't defined. If the OP had managed to find the answer to that in
his textbook then the
question would never have arrived here.
I seriously doubt the OP is interested in niceties as main() vs.
main(void) or int main(void).
Hans

Checking... at least under GCC, it compiles (with a warning due to
printf()), runs, and gives the expected result.

 

[Willem]

Hans Vlems wrote:
)> > main()
)> > {
)> > int d=010;
)> > printf("%d",d);
)> > }
)>
)> I don't want to be too rude, but you could compile and run it and find
)> the output for yourself much faster than you can expect an answer here.
)
) My guess is that the OP did do that. And it failed to compile because
) printf
) wasn't defined.
Why do you guess that? My guess is that it never even came near a compiler.

If the OP had managed to find the answer to that in
) his textbook then the
) question would never have arrived here.

True, but if the OP had actually opened his textbook he would have had a
much better chance at finding the answer.

) I seriously doubt the OP is interested in niceties as main() vs.
) main(void) or int main(void).

That is just a stick to hit people with when they post homework questions.

HTH HAND

SaSW, Willem
--
Disclaimer: I am in no way responsible for any of the statements
made in the above text. For all I know I might be
drugged or something..
No I'm not paranoid. You all think I'm paranoid, don't you !
#EOT

 

[Keith Thompson]

My guess is he didn't. My guess is it's our resident troll again.
Let's count shall we:

no #includes
no type for main
no void
no trailing newline on printf
no return from main

5 out of 5.

That's ignoring the actual problem of course.

My guess is that it's simply old code. IIRC, 4 out of 5 of the
things you count are characteristics of the "hello world" program
in K&R1.

 

[James Kuyper]

My guess is that it's simply old code. IIRC, 4 out of 5 of the
things you count are characteristics of the "hello world" program
in K&R1.

How about:
no follow-up response.

That's generally a pretty good indicator of our resident troll.

 

[Chad]

How about:
no follow-up response.

That's generally a pretty good indicator of our resident troll.

So like, I got rejected by UCLA three times in a row and UC Berkeley
like 4 times in a row. Actually, now that I think about it, the people
in the Computer Science Department at UCLA didn't even want to talk to
me this last time around.

 

[Keith Thompson]

So like, I got rejected by UCLA three times in a row and UC Berkeley
like 4 times in a row. Actually, now that I think about it, the people
in the Computer Science Department at UCLA didn't even want to talk to
me this last time around.

I can't wait to see how this turns out to be relevant.

 

[Todd Carnes]

So like, I got rejected by UCLA three times in a row and UC Berkeley
like 4 times in a row. Actually, now that I think about it, the people
in the Computer Science Department at UCLA didn't even want to talk to
me this last time around.

Not the type of thing most would brag about...

 

[James Kuyper]

How about:
no follow-up response.

And, for good measure,
No other messages ever posted to usenet using that e-mail address.

 

[Phil Carmody]

Hans Vlems wrote:
) I seriously doubt the OP is interested in niceties as main() vs.
) main(void) or int main(void).

That is just a stick to hit people with when they post homework questions.

It's a stick people wave around, but there's no evidence of any
contact being made.

Phil