Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Keith Thompson, post: 1699440"] Other than the URL, there's no mention of the common abbreviation "xor"; there probably should be. Another thing I just noticed: <iso646.h> defines the following macros: and && and_eq &= bitand & bitor | compl ~ not ! not_eq != or || or_eq |= xor ^ xor_eq ^= The "and", "or", and "not" macros refer to the logical operators, but the "xor" macro refers to the bitwise operator. If a logical-xor "^^" operator were added, the asymmetry would be painful. [/QUOTE]