N
Nick Locke
I have already seen this:
and I assume that this is still correct. I had been hoping to see a
generated class definition relating to the fault element already definined
in the WSDL - but apparently not!
I will be returning effectively an array of Error Codes and Error
Descriptions. What is the recommended way to make sure that my (contract
first) WSDL correctly represents what I am going to return from ASP.NET? Or
is plan B to not actually formally define the error format in the WSDL?
Thanks, Nick.
and I assume that this is still correct. I had been hoping to see a
generated class definition relating to the fault element already definined
in the WSDL - but apparently not!
I will be returning effectively an array of Error Codes and Error
Descriptions. What is the recommended way to make sure that my (contract
first) WSDL correctly represents what I am going to return from ASP.NET? Or
is plan B to not actually formally define the error format in the WSDL?
Thanks, Nick.