L
leap
I'm very new to XML, and have only spent about
10 minutes looking for something I already know
I want. Pardon me if the availability of what
I want is common knowledge among XML cognoscenti.
My subject line doesn't really do justice to
my meaning.
What I want is an editor for XML that displays
XML with a lot less redundancy.
For example, the XML snippet as follows
=========================
<configuration-file>
<section name="section1">
<entry name="name1" value="value1"/>
<entry name="name2" value="value2"/>
</section>
<section name="section2">
<entry name="someothername" value="someothervalue"/>
</section>
</configuration-file>
=========================
would be rendered in the hypothetical editor
pane somewhat like this:
=========================
configuration-file
section name="section1"
entry name="name1" value="value1"
name="name2" value="value2"
section name="section2"
entry name="someothername" value="someothervalue"
=========================
Two points I'd like to make clear:
(1) I mean something *like* this, not *exactly*
like this. I'm flexible. Really. ;-)
(2) I don't want to hear about how I should
really read and write straight XML, how
it's good for my soul, how I won't really
understand XML if I don't read and write
XML using standard syntactic conventions, how
I'm trying to turn XML into some other
language, or into a new language, or into
COBOL, or whatever, or how existing XML
editors, with their color-codings and
input helpers, make reading and writing
XML "as easy" as what I'm thinking of, after
I "get used to it", etc., etc.,
So that you don't waste keystrokes explaining
the unnecessary: I studied computer science
at a decent school, have programmed in C, C++
Lisp, and various other languages, and my
career in software spans several decades,
including work in integrated circuit design
tools and format converters for them. I even
hand a small hand in defining an electronic
design interchange format (EDIF 1.0) that was
somewhat somewhat in the spirit of XML,
though different in syntax. In short, I may
be an XML newbie, but I'm far from a newbie
when it comes to many of the issues XML
seems to address.
Even from what little I've read about XML,
I can see that it affords considerable leverage.
It's just that I'm not sold on reading and
writing raw XML (except for self-tutorial
purposes) if I don't have to. (If I *do*
have to, I'd appreciate knowing why, despite
my whiny and defensive disclaimer point #2,
above.)
This is just a request for information:
is there something like what I want out
there somewhere? If there isn't, is there
a good reason why not?
If this is colossally boring issue for this
forum, but you still want to help me, a reply
by private e-mail would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Michael Turner
(e-mail address removed)
10 minutes looking for something I already know
I want. Pardon me if the availability of what
I want is common knowledge among XML cognoscenti.
My subject line doesn't really do justice to
my meaning.
What I want is an editor for XML that displays
XML with a lot less redundancy.
For example, the XML snippet as follows
=========================
<configuration-file>
<section name="section1">
<entry name="name1" value="value1"/>
<entry name="name2" value="value2"/>
</section>
<section name="section2">
<entry name="someothername" value="someothervalue"/>
</section>
</configuration-file>
=========================
would be rendered in the hypothetical editor
pane somewhat like this:
=========================
configuration-file
section name="section1"
entry name="name1" value="value1"
name="name2" value="value2"
section name="section2"
entry name="someothername" value="someothervalue"
=========================
Two points I'd like to make clear:
(1) I mean something *like* this, not *exactly*
like this. I'm flexible. Really. ;-)
(2) I don't want to hear about how I should
really read and write straight XML, how
it's good for my soul, how I won't really
understand XML if I don't read and write
XML using standard syntactic conventions, how
I'm trying to turn XML into some other
language, or into a new language, or into
COBOL, or whatever, or how existing XML
editors, with their color-codings and
input helpers, make reading and writing
XML "as easy" as what I'm thinking of, after
I "get used to it", etc., etc.,
So that you don't waste keystrokes explaining
the unnecessary: I studied computer science
at a decent school, have programmed in C, C++
Lisp, and various other languages, and my
career in software spans several decades,
including work in integrated circuit design
tools and format converters for them. I even
hand a small hand in defining an electronic
design interchange format (EDIF 1.0) that was
somewhat somewhat in the spirit of XML,
though different in syntax. In short, I may
be an XML newbie, but I'm far from a newbie
when it comes to many of the issues XML
seems to address.
Even from what little I've read about XML,
I can see that it affords considerable leverage.
It's just that I'm not sold on reading and
writing raw XML (except for self-tutorial
purposes) if I don't have to. (If I *do*
have to, I'd appreciate knowing why, despite
my whiny and defensive disclaimer point #2,
above.)
This is just a request for information:
is there something like what I want out
there somewhere? If there isn't, is there
a good reason why not?
If this is colossally boring issue for this
forum, but you still want to help me, a reply
by private e-mail would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Michael Turner
(e-mail address removed)