XML Schema error on mutually exclusive fields

[wooks]

I have defined a schema with an xsd:choice element for 2 mutually
exclusive fields.

When both are present I get an error which is good, but what is not so
good is the error message which says something like "Element content
is invalid. Expecting: fieldname, {...."

The problem (if it is one) is that the "Expecting: fieldname..." bit
is wrong - fieldname is not the next field... in fact it's optional.
However it seems to have tagged the the correct field (the mutually
exclusive one) as being in error.

So is there truly an error here or is it simply a case of a crappy
somewhat misleading error message.

 

[Martin Honnen]

I have defined a schema with an xsd:choice element for 2 mutually
exclusive fields.

When both are present I get an error which is good, but what is not so
good is the error message which says something like "Element content
is invalid. Expecting: fieldname, {...."

The problem (if it is one) is that the "Expecting: fieldname..." bit
is wrong - fieldname is not the next field... in fact it's optional.
However it seems to have tagged the the correct field (the mutually
exclusive one) as being in error.

So is there truly an error here or is it simply a case of a crappy
somewhat misleading error message.

Which validating parser are you using?

 

[wooks]

Which validating parser are you using?

MSXML 4.0

 

[wooks]

Which validating parser are you using?

MSXML 4.0

 

[Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz]

MSXML 4.0

The software from m$ is notorious for incorrect, misleading and
unhelpful messages. Have you checked any of the alternatives?

--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>

Unsolicited bulk E-mail subject to legal action. I reserve the
right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail. Reply to
domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do not
reply to (e-mail address removed)

 

[wooks]

The software from m$ is notorious for incorrect, misleading and
unhelpful messages. Have you checked any of the alternatives?

No I will stick to using MSXML but now I know not to panic over
idiosyncratic error messages. THank you.