S
shaun roe
mild rant follows
Working now for a couple of years with xslt and now xslt 2.0, does
anyone else get the impression that xslt 2.0 somehow missed the point?
Yes its got a fancy new data model (and thank goodness for the new
grouping functions), but where are the functions which would really have
made it useful without taxing the implementers? e.g trigonometry
functions for SVG; square root /log function to do simple statistics?
hex/ dec conversions which dont need 50 lines of extraneous code?
i.e. practical functions, implementable in a web browser which would not
mean re-writing the whole thing from the ground up, and which would have
done a lot more to popularize its usage.
There's plenty of room here for a XSLT 1.5 standard implemented
retroactively...
ok that was it. I'll get back in my box now.
Working now for a couple of years with xslt and now xslt 2.0, does
anyone else get the impression that xslt 2.0 somehow missed the point?
Yes its got a fancy new data model (and thank goodness for the new
grouping functions), but where are the functions which would really have
made it useful without taxing the implementers? e.g trigonometry
functions for SVG; square root /log function to do simple statistics?
hex/ dec conversions which dont need 50 lines of extraneous code?
i.e. practical functions, implementable in a web browser which would not
mean re-writing the whole thing from the ground up, and which would have
done a lot more to popularize its usage.
There's plenty of room here for a XSLT 1.5 standard implemented
retroactively...
ok that was it. I'll get back in my box now.