A mascot for a grown-up programming language has a version which is nude???
*gasp* Nudity! That could never be art...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_(Michelangelo)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_de_milo
Or a logo...
http://www.deadprogrammer.com/starbucks-logo-mermaid
I'm glad this mascot isn't widely acknowledged as it
is not only irrelevant to ruby, it's also quite childish.
Well, hey, one more:
http://python.org/
And, of course, some variations:
http://www.cafepress.com/wxpython
Quite childish, and somewhat less to do with the origin of the name (which is
Monty Python, not actual pythons).
I would hope that if Ruby did officially adopt a mascot it would be much
more suited to it's task.
Well, again -- see Starbucks.
I'm not really sure how you would make a logo relevant, here.
At the end of the day, Ruby is about making programming easier, and about
making the computer work for you. I honestly have trouble figuring out how to
put that into a logo -- a robot in a maid uniform? A happy person sitting at
a computer?
Some of the better-known logos in software
http://kernel.org/
have NOTHING to do with their projects, either in name or in content.
At least ruby-chan has red hair! And she looks pretty -- Ruby is also about
beautiful code. Could be argued that it's about sexy code, but I'll say no
more about that.
I'm just playing Devil's Advocate. I like Ruby-chan, but I also see value in
not having a mascot.
I have no opinion either way, other than "Kawaii!"