Well, I owe you an apology for the Monty Python reference. It's
not my intention to insult you.
thank you. no problem.
Let me attempt to be constructive.
thanks hal.
The common perception was, I think, that a vim clone would implement
at least a large subset of vim's features. Objectively, ruvi isn't
there yet. Subjectively, everyone uses/likes different features of
vim anyway. Even if it implemented 95% of vim, there would still be
people who would want some obscure feature and throw up their hands
because it wasn't there.
agreed
FWIW, here are some of the vim commands I use (all I can think of).
The least frequently used is ^V -- the others I use pretty much on
a daily basis.
i use ^V very frequently in fact
:i,j<cmd> [ak: moved this line]
[n]cw
numbers/rangfes previous to commands isn't that generic yet
will be done after i return from holidays hopefully.
interesting. never seen these before
good point. missed this one
didn't know about this one
but reminded me that i need to implement ctrl-g
interesting
:rblah iirc i already implemented
but :r behaviour is funny
while :r!shellcmd
does work i didn't do ! style filtering yet.
on todo list now
eek. never knew this one.
always use gUl
true. missed this.
ummm possible missing. can't recall.
missing at the moment. i could
never find a good use for marks.
anyone got a nice non-interactive
example for a usage? (as in a nice
command rather than just use as a
bookmark i don't find single letters
all that useful
i'd prefer a class browser with
tags - press a shortcut on the
given class and it will be highlighted
thusly enabling easy find next time...
umm... interesting new feature
%
:%s/regex/text/[g]
:i,js/regex/text[g]
all three missing pretty simple though
but :g otoh will be a while load of work
:g//normal though is fairly easy and i actually
find this *much* more useful. thanks gavin
Thanks for all your work, and good luck with this project.
thanks very much for this extremely constructive positing
and thanks to all for the followups
Alex