appendChild & cloneNode

D

David Mark

LOL and funny ? That wasn't supposed to be funny, or did you see any
smiley ? That's pathetic and pitiful for a *JAVASCRIPT* FAQ...

No, it is pathetic and pitiful that you can't use Google.
 
R

RobG

Again ? Ok, here it goes:

That is not a suitable FAQ entry. Would you be happy if the entire FAQ
was reduced to links to ECMA-262 and the W3C DOM pages?


Perhaps you would. The above links have nothing to do with JSON, why
would that be part of a JSON FAQ entry?

Firstly you have to work out what the question is - since there aren't
any asked here specifically about JSON, you'll have to make one up.
The answer should briefly explain what JSON is and how to use it.
Lastly, include a link to json.org. Perhaps you could also write a
longer article that could be linked to the notes pages and shows how
to use JSON in an XMLHttpRequest response.

If you aren't prepared to do that, there likely won't be a JSON entry
as there seems to be little enthusiasm to answer a question that no
one has asked.
 
T

Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn

Garrett said:
It does seem to work the other way, too. Guess it isn't funny after all.
Just annoying.

Since when do URI( references)s work with Google's `site:' parameter in the
first place?


PointedEars
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
473,995
Messages
2,570,233
Members
46,820
Latest member
GilbertoA5

Latest Threads

Top