G
guru.slt
Hi,
Who can recommend a good IDE for C++ in Linux ?
Thanks!
Does the IDE use gcc compiler?
Who can recommend a good IDE for C++ in Linux ?
Thanks!
Does the IDE use gcc compiler?
When I install KDevlop, it says: "checking for Qt... configure: error:
Qt (>= Qt 3.2) (headers and libraries) not found."
What is "Qt" ? Thanks!
When I install KDevlop, it says: "checking for Qt... configure: error:
Qt (>= Qt 3.2) (headers and libraries) not found."
Bernd said:Is KDE running on your system?
If no: first install KDE.
If yes: install the qt-devel packages of your distribution.
If they are installed, try ./configure --with-qt-libs=...
B.
Hi,
Who can recommend a good IDE for C++ in Linux ?
Thanks!
Does the IDE use gcc compiler?
Matthias said:Bogus. You don't need to install KDE to run QT Apps (thanks god). It's
sufficient to install the QT runtime libraries. Your package manager
will most certainly do this for you when resolving the dependencies. If
it doesn't, you should consider changing your distro...
thank you guys! I installed anjuta, works very well.
Larry said:KDE is required by KDevelop. Ref:
http://kdevelop.org/index.html?filename=3.2/requirements.html
Larry
Matthias said:If KDevelop crashes as often as most other QT apps, you don't want to
use it anyway. We had to work on an UML diagram for about 6 hours today
and unfortunately chose Umbrello to do the job, and it crashed pretty
regularly every 5-10 minutes
Ctrl+S is your friend.
Matthias said:Larry said:KDE is required by KDevelop. Ref:
http://kdevelop.org/index.html?filename=3.2/requirements.html
Larry
Looks like I was wrong with the "only needs QT" thing. However, if you
mean "requires the KDE Desktop" with "requires KDE", you're still
mistaken. You will only need "kdelibs4" and "kdebase-bin".
[root]# aptitude install kdevelop3
[...]
Need to get 15.3MB of archives. After unpacking 42.2MB will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?]
As compared to installing the whole KDE package:
[root]# aptitude install kde
[...]
Need to get 149MB of archives. After unpacking 410MB will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?]
Talk about a ~135MB difference here!
So trust me, you DON'T want to install KDE just for using KDevelop...
Blame the KDevelop website admin for this shameless plug.
Matthias said:[...] We had to work on an UML diagram for about 6 hours today
and unfortunately chose Umbrello to do the job, and it crashed pretty
regularly every 5-10 minutes
Vyacheslav said:So by experience with one Umbrello you make such conclusion: "crashes
as often as most other QT apps". Do you mean there are 3-5 applications
for QT? How many QT application have you been used? How many of them
crashes?
Regards,
Vyacheslav
Oliver said:Matthias said:[...] We had to work on an UML diagram for about 6 hours today
and unfortunately chose Umbrello to do the job, and it crashed pretty
regularly every 5-10 minutes
Admitted, Umbrello has had stability problems in past versions.
Please use at least version 1.4, it's much more stable.
Version 1.4.1 (to be released together with KDE 3.4.1 in a few days)
is even better.
If you still have problems with these recent Umbrello versions,
post them to http://bugs.kde.org/ and we'll look into them.
Oliver M. Kellogg
Matthias said:Bogus. You don't need to install KDE to run QT Apps (thanks god). It's
sufficient to install the QT runtime libraries. Your package manager
will most certainly do this for you when resolving the dependencies. If
it doesn't, you should consider changing your distro...
Matthias said:How in heaven do you come to the conclusion I would only have used
Umbrello so far from the large set of QT apps? Even if it's only 3-5
applications, if they are major ones, that's serious enough, and for
sure a good reason to not use KDE as your desktop. I prefer stability
and usability over eye candy.
Anyway, it has happened with enough QT applications to leave that bitter
taste on my tongue. It was one reason why I changed the desktop from KDE
to Xfce and I never looked back.
One other major example is K3B, and amaroK wouldn't even start on my
system, it crashed before the GUI came up. Umbrello crashed every 10
minutes, in other words it's unusable. I noticed even Firefox and Emacs
(!), non-QT apps, crashing under the KDE desktop, that has never
happened in any other WM or Desktop I have been using.
Anyway, maybe it's just coincidence, or maybe not. QT was developed
pre-98 and has a lot of non-standard stuff in it, that already turns me
off, I'm glad they want to revise the whole library with the 4.0 release.
Matthias said:How in heaven do you come to the conclusion I would only have used
Umbrello so far from the large set of QT apps? Even if it's only 3-5
applications, if they are major ones, that's serious enough, and for
sure a good reason to not use KDE as your desktop. I prefer stability
and usability over eye candy.
Anyway, it has happened with enough QT applications to leave that bitter
taste on my tongue. It was one reason why I changed the desktop from KDE
to Xfce and I never looked back.
One other major example is K3B, and amaroK wouldn't even start on my
system, it crashed before the GUI came up. Umbrello crashed every 10
minutes, in other words it's unusable. I noticed even Firefox and Emacs
(!), non-QT apps, crashing under the KDE desktop, that has never
happened in any other WM or Desktop I have been using.
Anyway, maybe it's just coincidence, or maybe not. QT was developed
pre-98 and has a lot of non-standard stuff in it, that already turns me
off, I'm glad they want to revise the whole library with the 4.0 release.
Matthias said:How in heaven do you come to the conclusion I would only have used
Umbrello so far from the large set of QT apps? Even if it's only 3-5
applications, if they are major ones, that's serious enough, and for
sure a good reason to not use KDE as your desktop. I prefer stability
and usability over eye candy.
Anyway, it has happened with enough QT applications to leave that bitter
taste on my tongue. It was one reason why I changed the desktop from KDE
to Xfce and I never looked back.
One other major example is K3B, and amaroK wouldn't even start on my
system, it crashed before the GUI came up. Umbrello crashed every 10
minutes, in other words it's unusable. I noticed even Firefox and Emacs
(!), non-QT apps, crashing under the KDE desktop, that has never
happened in any other WM or Desktop I have been using.
Anyway, maybe it's just coincidence, or maybe not. QT was developed
pre-98 and has a lot of non-standard stuff in it, that already turns me
off, I'm glad they want to revise the whole library with the 4.0 release.
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.