F
Francis Hwang
zuzu said:to start with, http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/current-stable.html
FreeBSD (perhaps the *BSDs in general) seem to have defined a standard
for what versioning should mean. not just release vs. current vs.
stable, but also their numbering.
so patterns exist to stablize what versioning should constitute.
I wasn't saying that patterns don't exist. I was saying that consensus
has not been reached.
Personally, whenever I'm checking out new libraries, I always look for
some sort of statement about whether it's alpha, beta, stable,
whatever. Sometimes that's a note on the web page, or a little tag on
the Sourceforge or Rubyforge page.
Is the Ruby community significantly out of step with the broader free
software community on this?
F.