Calloc of "unsigned char my_bytes[256][256]"

[Programmer Dude]

Alan Balmer wrote:

}} Self-evidentially not the case. ;-)

Since your usage of the word doesn't seem to correspond with the
dictionary meaning, maybe you could share what you mean it to mean.

The evidence is clear to ones self.

"Self-evident" is very similar, but "evident" has a slightly
different shade of meaning (syn. "manifest" for e.g.). Webster
defines it as "evident without *proof* or reasoning".

I intentionally was referring to the plainly-visible evidence.
Proof and reasoning were extant.

 

[Alan Balmer]

IMO he meant it to mean "evidently" but deliberately misspelled it as
a joke. Which has of course got out of hand as we've all got
increasingly anal.... :-()

Personally, I'm so impressed by the latest obfuscation that I will
retire in awe, and say no more.

 

[Programmer Dude]

IMO he meant it to mean "evidently"...
Nope.

...but deliberately misspelled it as a joke.

Nope.
(The joke, if any, is your *opinions* about what *I* meant.)

Which has of course got out of hand as we've all got increasingly
anal.... :-()

Such is clc. ;-|

Personally, I'm so impressed by the latest obfuscation...

Call it what you will if that makes you feel better.

 

[Mark McIntyre]

On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 15:14:24 -0500, in comp.lang.c , Programmer Dude

(stuff)

yeah, whatever. Most of us are trying to turn this thread back into
light humour, Chris. You can take it seriously if you want.
ICBWBYLAPIYD.