Client Create Dynamic Window/HTML

[Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn]

In most jurisdictions copyright is automatic.
True.

How does Usenet negate these automatic rights?

It does not, although it should be noted that the correct "most" in your
statement implies that those rights are not granted automatically everywhere
where Usenet articles are distributed or retrieved to.

But copyright was only another of Korpela's red herrings, and in this case
also an outright lie: Copyright has nothing to do with attributed quotation
as it is customary in Usenet. Given proper attribution, anyone can quote
anything from anyone anywhere in Usenet without running the risk of a
copyright lawsuit.

Copying posting content for reuse elsewhere without explicit given
permission of the author, given sufficient threshold of originality and lack
of distribution license that makes permission unnecessary, is an entirely
different issue.

Please stay on-topic.


F'up2 poster

PointedEars, IANAL

 

[John G Harris]

That section of HTML 4.01 Specification does not (and could not) make a
meta element required in some situations as a validity requirement. It
does not even make it required otherwise.

<snip>

Hoping that this will prevent future arguments, I'm pointing out that
section 19.1 of the HTML4.1 standard says that a valid document does
more than just conform to the DTD.

John

 

[Jukka K. Korpela]

Hoping that this will prevent future arguments,

I don't think you can prevent trolls from giving incorrect off-topic
lessons or others from pointing out their errors. Saying that you wish
to prevent future arguments tends to trigger them.

I'm pointing out that
section 19.1 of the HTML4.1 standard says that a valid document does
more than just conform to the DTD.

There is no "HTML4.1 standard". And section 19.1 of the HTML 4.01
specification is sloppy non-normative prose, and it does not in any way
affect the incorrectness of the statement about some meta tag being
required for validity.

Part of the sloppiness is that it refers to hypothetical software that
checks more than an SGML validator does, in a manner that suggests that
such software exists. It's an interesting idea, and such software would
in fact be useful, or at least would have been, but it is noteworthy
that no particular software is even alluded to.

 

[Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn]

Hoping that this will prevent future arguments,

I don't think you can prevent trolls from giving incorrect off-topic
lessons […]

Hmm, hmm. Apparently not.

<

PointedEars

 

[MC]

Soooooooooo,
window.open is still the only way lol. This is working, and on Chrome there
is no noticeable pause while the browser draws the content into the open
window. Still much much quicker than hitting the server for generated
content. My page opens and displays in under 500ms.

Thanks,
MC