Code Effect

[Walter Roberson]

Obviously the given code would not compile on any comipler because of
missing header and all & we are assumed to add that(Mere common sense).
and the code which i compiled was:
#include<stdio.h>
main()
{
char ch;
ch = '7';
printf("%d\n",ch);
return 0;
}
Now is it okay for you.

You extrapolated incorrect code, as you used an improper declaration
of main().

If you are going to extrapolate code anyhow, then why not
extrapolate something slightly different, such as

#define printf(a,b) (b / a[3])

instead of #include <stdio.h> ?

What's that you say, that's not what the original poster intended?
And you know that exactly how?? And since the original question
was obviously some kind of test material, do you presume that
you know the intention of the original test author as well??

Now compile it and it will print "55".

Several people corrected you on that already but you did not appear
to listen. "55" is, at best, the most -common- result of the
program. If the program were run on an EBCDIC system, the result
would be quite different. And in saying that it will print "55"
you missed the newline...

 

[CBFalconer]

.... snip ...

We could argue about whether that point was one worth making, but
let's not.

You must be kidding. Around here that almost guarantees an active
6 month thread, more if some nut cross-posts it.

 

[sandeep]

You extrapolated incorrect code, as you used an improper declaration
of main().

Well i didnt extrapolated the code beacuse if i would comiple that.it
would show some error.
I probably typed incorrectly at that time.

If you are going to extrapolate code anyhow, then why not
extrapolate something slightly different, such as

#define printf(a,b) (b / a[3])

instead of #include <stdio.h> ?

What's that you say, that's not what the original poster intended?
And you know that exactly how?? And since the original question
was obviously some kind of test material, do you presume that
you know the intention of the original test author as well??

Now compile it and it will print "55".

Several people corrected you on that already but you did not appear
to listen. "55" is, at best, the most -common- result of the
program. If the program were run on an EBCDIC system, the result
would be quite different. And in saying that it will print "55"
you missed the newline...

 

[james]

Thanks for correcting me.

 

[CBFalconer]

Thanks for correcting me.

Thanks to whom for correcting what? You need quotes with
attributions. See my sig below.