:And that's my whole point. Again without mentioning spam, how would you
:justify ignoring anything someone posts simply because of their name? (or
:email, or fake email, as the case may be)
:It
:doesn't mean you have to read every message posted (as you seem to like
:extremes), but it does mean you should be more receptive to another's point
f view, even if you don't agree.
Your philosophy is, if I understand correctly, that one should not
use prejudice (to pre-judge) in selecting postings, because
those one are prejudiced against might have valid points of view.
The truth is, though, that we use prejudice all the time in selecting
what we are going to pay attention to: we have our favorite
newspapers, favorite radio stations, favorite tv stations and shows,
favorite magazines, favorite newsgroups, favorite people, and so on.
Perhaps -ideally- it would be good to give attention to everything,
but it isn't humanly possible: selective attention is a survival
mechanism!
:As a simple example, say everyone
:killfiled Godzilla. Who would that leave to point out her garbage?
Leave replying to her to those who consider doing so to be more
important than other choices they have available to them.
As for me, I can't fight -every- battle: I don't even have time to know
about every battle going on, let alone research them all and form an
informed opinion on them all and contribute to one or more of the sides
in each. So I killfile where I feel it appropriate -- not at the drop
of the proverbial hat, but when it becomes clear that the person
is not amenable to reason.
There are posters out there who are literally insane; there are
posters who are highly delusional; there are posters who are
religious or political extremists. You *cannot* convince these posters
through any amount of reason. You know the expression about
wrestling with pigs... that you just get dirty, and the pig enjoys it.