B
Beauregard T. Shagnasty
K said:Some sources say to use it on <html>, some say <body>,
body { font-size: 100%; }
http://k75s.home.att.net/fontsize.html#samplecss
K said:Some sources say to use it on <html>, some say <body>,
K A Nuttall said:Oh god, I need to lie down. Unfortunately, that thread is a bit like
this one: full of conflicting opinions, thinly veiled insults,
dogmatism, and very little hard fact - and eleven pages of it, in
Google Groups.
I've adopted this 100% idea, for a test period. Some sources say to use
it on <html>, some say <body>, and nowhere can I find an in-depth
analysis of its effects on different browsers, compared to the use of
size names, other than using it to counteract the effects of the IE em
bug. I'll have to find time to experiment with this.
dorayme said:Welcome to newsgroups.
Look, the truth is likely to be that there
are so many browsers, so many platforms, so many variables that
there is no bible on the matter. If you have someone with good
sense - eg. the resident ascetic, old B - saying to set the body
to 100%, just do it.
In addition, you have an argument, namely it
avoids a bug in IE.
There are other arguments. You need to think
through them and simply adopt a policy.
K A Nuttall said:Been doing usenet for 12 years, but thanks anyway
This group's new to me though. I've lurked here for maybe a couple of
months. I changed career to web developer last year, and eventually
thought I ought to hang out in 'places of wisdom'.
Crikey, you sound like a young dorayme, I was independentlyThe thing is, I don't work that way. I like to see a
problem/discussion/solution/explanation on a given subject that
satisfies my question. And I usually find good stuff on most bugs I
come across, eventually.
It's not that I don't believe old B (who's that then?), I just like to
see a rationale for a technique before I'm satisfied. I've always been
like that. I couldn't just learn formulae at school, I had to
understand them.
Well, that's good enough in itself, except I don't think I've ever had
the problem it solves (never set body in ems).
That's what I'm doing, next time I spend an evening with my web stuff.
I might report back with my findings, if people promise not to maul me.
"David Smithz said:It's the OP here.
Phew, what can I say. I've been away looking forward to coming back and
continuing the project.
Thansk for ALL the input. However, what I am supposed to be doing again?
So was there an overal recommneded method for me to implement my font sizes?
My aim:
I want to cater for as many websites people as possible.
I want the design to look how it has been desiged in photo shop and printed
as a pdf
I want users the abilty to enlarge the fonts if they really need to.
In summary what is the most authorative oponion out there on how to approach
this?
Perhaps there isn't, but after getting a bit confused I'm currenlty back to
using pixels.
dorayme said:You are kidding or else trying to be provocative now! After all
that has been said!
I didn't read the thread. I believe I know what was said by the majority
of authoritative posters in the thread. So I'm going to suggest <wink>
that he use pixels. That sounds perfect for him, unless he wants to
determine who is authoritative. My eyes are winking themselves out of
their sockets. Pixelz rulez Mrz. Smithz.
leo
David said:I want users the abilty to enlarge the fonts if they really need to.
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.