M
Mark Parnell
Sometime around 13 Nov 2003 06:13:58 GMT, Eric Bohlman is reported to have
stated:
You would think so, but luckily the waiting lists are pretty long, so the
turnover of kids isn't too big.
There's always the possibility that she may look after someone with the
same name when she goes back to work, but that's not so bad.
Incidentally, we happened to pick a name that was one of the top 20 in
Australia last year, yet she hasn't looked after someone with that name.
There were definitely no celebrity-type names on our list though.
stated:
I should think that
one of the corrolaries to Murphy's law would imply that if the two of you
chose any name in the top 1000 baby names, someone with a kid by that exact
name would immediately move into your community and enroll their child in
your wife's facility. Unless you chose the type of name that only a
celebrity would choose.
You would think so, but luckily the waiting lists are pretty long, so the
turnover of kids isn't too big.
There's always the possibility that she may look after someone with the
same name when she goes back to work, but that's not so bad.
Incidentally, we happened to pick a name that was one of the top 20 in
Australia last year, yet she hasn't looked after someone with that name.
There were definitely no celebrity-type names on our list though.