lawrence said:
But surely you can't mean that?
What portion of these designers you talk about have a website that validates
and contains properly structured HTML? Go on, have a look. Now, when you
find out the vast majority of them have websites that don't validate and
have no sensible structure - then you need to ask yourself why that is that
these pages are not valid and not well structured. Is it the tool, or the
web designer that is causing the problem?
"Well that's what Dreamweaver / Frontpage generates" is a symptomatic excuse
that the tool is switched on, and the brain is switched off. Web designers
create websites, they use tools to do so - that can only really be done
well with the brain engaged. So markup that is broken coming out the tool
chosen for the job is fixed in one of two ways:
* Fix it by hand (requires a brain and knowledge of HTML - no problem for
someone developing websites)
* Use a tool that isn't broken.
Look around the web and you see a lot
of excellent work being done in Dreamweaver and Frontpage.
I see 0.7% of pages on the web that actually validate. Looking for websites
that are properly structured in this is needle and haystack time. How many
of these 0.7% of sites are done by webdesigners exclusively relying on
Frontpage or Dreamweaver? How many websites in the 99.3% of websites are
created using Frontpage and Dreamweaver? You will find the vast majority of
professional web designers in the 99.3% "haven't got the basics right"
category.
I have the
impression, from talking with people at the local tech society, that
the majority of designers use one of these tools.
Numbers does not equate to a compelling argument. Sheep mentality is a known
disorder on the web. Rather evaluate the tools on merit and the ability to
aid you in getting the job done properly.