[EVALUATION] - E04 - Mr. Yukihiro Matsumoto (Ruby's Weakest Point)

[Ilias Lazaridis]

Please let this thread just end.

 

[staypufd]

Slience may lead a quiet mind, but being rude yeilds contempt. From
reading around on the internet about you, there seems to be alot of
that for you.
You insult those who've actually created. Yet, from searching with
Google, I find nothing that you've created. You only complain. You
don't even have a resume to show what you've helped do.
You don't actually fix the problems you find. Just complain! Those who
are not part of the solution are part of the problem and you are part
of the problem. Many others seek to understand and then actually
better the languages or tools. You seek to find flaws, crap on those
who create and then walk away.... Thus only leaving behind destruction.
Thus you are the failure, you are part of a problem, you are worthless
to those you criticize!

It is about time for you to go create something that is "better" than
all the things you criticize and then show us the way. Till then don't
come back and don't bother replying as your a waste of all of our time
as well as your own. You can not create anything but unrest! Be gone!

 

[Ilias Lazaridis]

Please let this thread just end.

Mr. "(e-mail address removed)".

I am wondering if this is your only "gmail" acount.

Cause ann abuse comlain will terminate all of them.

Prepare.

..

 

[Ilias Lazaridis]

I didn't even realize Ruby was OO. Ruby is a fun procedural language.
I gotta admit though, that those class thingies are somewhat useful as
syntactic sugar.

The Creator of Ruby

Yukihiro Matsumoto,

writes

"
# Ruby is a complete, full, pure object oriented language: OOL. This
means all data in Ruby is an object, in the sense of Smalltalk: no
exceptions. Example: In Ruby, the number 1 is an instance of class Fixnum.
# Ruby's OO is carefully designed to be both complete and open for
improvements. Example: Ruby has the ability to add methods to a class,
or even to an instance during runtime. So, if needed, an instance of one
class *can* behave differently from other instances of the same class.
"
source: http://ruby-lang.org/en/20020101.html

-

so, Species "simulated stupidity", please do not spread missleading
information, just to have a nice intro for your "FART":

What you may be really looking for is some sort of
language designer who can also be a father figure to you. I could be
that. I'd be willing to adopt you. There'll be lots of rules though.
Follow me, close your eyes, click your heels together and pull my
finger. We'll create a new language together.

FART (Fictive is not Another Ruby Tongue)

..

 

[Jon A. Lambert]

# Ruby is a complete, full, pure object oriented language: OOL. This

Not relevant to procedural language evaluation

..

Please remain on-topic, so I can remain on budget!


$cat test.rb
def f(i);x=5;p i;p x;end;(1..10).each do|x|f(x);break if x > 6;end

$ruby proctest.rb test.rb
running procedural test sequence...
...sequence tests [passed]
...alternation tests [passed]
...loop tests [passed]
...subprogram tests [passed]
...variable scope tests [passed]
...fun quotient tests [passed]

EVALUATION COMPLETE:
Ruby is fun procedural language!

ERROR: Lazaridis object provided false analysis.
DIAGNOSIS: Lazaridis object defective.
ACTION: Cannot adopt Lazaridis object.

FART analysis now overbudget... (_o_)...pulling plug.

Make your time now

 

[Ilias Lazaridis]

# Ruby is a complete, full, pure object oriented language: OOL. This

Not relevant to procedural language evaluation

.

Please remain on-topic, so I can remain on budget!


$cat test.rb
def f(i);x=5;p i;p x;end;(1..10).each do|x|f(x);break if x > 6;end
$ruby proctest.rb test.rb
running procedural test sequence...
..sequence tests [passed]
..alternation tests [passed]
..loop tests [passed]
..subprogram tests [passed]
..variable scope tests [passed]
..fun quotient tests [passed]
EVALUATION COMPLETE: Ruby is fun procedural language!

ERROR: Lazaridis object provided false analysis.
DIAGNOSIS: Lazaridis object defective.
ACTION: Cannot adopt Lazaridis object.

FART analysis now overbudget... (_o_)...pulling plug.

Make your time now

whatever you say.

-

note to reader:

although the above seems nuts, it uncovers a very sad truth: if a
language-design misses a goal, don't worry.

simply redefine terminology and (if necessary) the goal - as it fits.

Ruby is not alone. That's what python does with the term "object",
that's what ruby does with the meaning of "object".

And finally: who cares? it's all about people and all about fun.

-

Silence, Forged Id's, Attacks and... nonsense.

This is what remained from the friendly Ruby Community.

-

I hope you've found the insights valueable.

..

 

[benny]

All of you are responsible for feeding this troll. You were ALL warned
this was a troll. From the first time he posted here the group was
warned about this troll.

But no. You had to feed it. You had to defend it. You had to help
turn threads into inane "movie" discussions with or without the mad man
himself. You had to attack the people warning you this was a troll.
Even people like Florian and matz participated in the feeding of Ilias.

So please Trans and others, don't act surprised or stupid now.

It's a *Good Thing* (TM) to be open minded as long as it's possible.
Even if it hurds sometimes. It makes the world face look more appealing.



benny