A
Alan J. Flavell
Ilya> To the contrary. There seems to be a substantial number of
Ilya> non-specialists who still believe in that the term "ASCII" has
some Ilya> unique meaning nowadays. It does not.
There's an ANSI standard that authoritatively refutes that claim; an
IANA assigment (http://www.iana.org/assignments/character-sets citing
RFC1345) which codifies the meaning of the term as it's to be used on
the Internet; and, in more practical terms, there's a whole body of
IETF standards-track RFCs whose meaning would be destroyed if "ASCII"
did not mean what it means: a formally-defined 7-bit encoding
*standard*, ANSI X3.4, and its ISO 646 counterpart.
Other (mis)usages of the term by non-specialists are widespread, I
know, but they're still authoritatively wrong, whatever you or I might
happen to think personally.
Wikipedia *seriously* disagrees with you:
In this case I'd agree with it; but that's hardly the world's most
authoritiative source of information.
I thought that needed to be placed on the record, but now I'll try to
resist any further trolling attempts. :-{