How we recognize newbies as newbies

S

Shadowman

Alf said:
1. Invalid "int _tmain", "void main", etc.
2. Needless and incorrect "(T) expression"
3. Complaints that output doesn't appear.
I have to say, I was a bit annoyed yesterday when I was trying to google
some Unix-specific function, and the majority of search results I got
turned out to link to mirrors of c.l.c++ and c.l.c.

So the information I got looked like:

Initial Poster: I'm trying to blah blah blah File descriptor blah
fork() blah.

Answer: Sorry, can't discuss that here.


Arrrrgh!!!


Of course, the corresponding discussion wasn't readily available in the
correct newsgroup. I'm not suggesting we do anything different, it's
just half funny and half annoying. We've got so much of that here that
it has diluted my web searches!
 
O

Old Wolf

1. Invalid "int _tmain", "void main", etc.
2. Needless and incorrect "(T) expression"
3. Complaints that output doesn't appear.

4. How do u implement sizeof?
 
T

tony_in_da_uk

1. Invalid "int _tmain", "void main", etc.
2. Needless and incorrect "(T) expression"
3. Complaints that output doesn't appear.

--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is it such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?

They still have the humility to ask honest questions simply, without
padding them with formality and technicalities to emphasise the
seriousness and thoroughness of their previous considerations. Half
of us old timers may never post a question - or at least not for
several years - almost as a matter of principle ;-P.

Tony
 
I

Ian Collins

They still have the humility to ask honest questions simply, without
padding them with formality and technicalities to emphasise the
seriousness and thoroughness of their previous considerations.

They also quote signatures....
 
F

Frank Birbacher

Hi!
1. Invalid "int _tmain", "void main", etc.
2. Needless and incorrect "(T) expression"
3. Complaints that output doesn't appear.

4. Replying (!) to a message to send a totaly new question. This should
be a new thread with a new subject instead.


Frank
 
R

red floyd

Hi!


4. Replying (!) to a message to send a totaly new question. This should
be a new thread with a new subject instead.

Frank

27. Execessive java-isms.
e.g.:
class C
{
// ...
};

int f()
{
C* c = new C;
// do stuff and don't delete c
}
 
F

Frank Birbacher

Hi!

red said:
27. Execessive java-isms.
e.g.:
class C
{
// ...
};

int f()
{
C* c = new C;
// do stuff and don't delete c
}

27b. Why is this not working?
C c = new C;

Frank
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,201
Messages
2,571,052
Members
47,656
Latest member
rickwatson

Latest Threads

Top