2
2apart
Is this where the javascript rookies (me) swing? Please point me to
the high
tolerance area. Thank you.
the high
tolerance area. Thank you.
E
Evertjan.
2apart wrote on 26 nov 2007 in comp.lang.javascript:
'rookies (me) swing'?
Could you translate that to English?
'this', in Javascript, is a reference to the local object scope.
Pointing outside this NG's scope is off topic.
Javascript does not tolerate script errors like CSS does.
'rookies (me) swing'?
Could you translate that to English?
'this', in Javascript, is a reference to the local object scope.
Pointing outside this NG's scope is off topic.
Javascript does not tolerate script errors like CSS does.
2
2apart
Oh, you know perl too?
K
Kailash Nadh
E
Evertjan.
Randy Webb wrote on 27 nov 2007 in comp.lang.javascript:
In a sense it is, because the OQ is off topic.
Pointing an off topic Q's OP in ther right direction
makes a NG a general Q-aire,
and that's what Netiquette in it's ancient wisdom tries to prevent.
But I tried to give the OP his
[his?, not even a nickname to suggest the binary type of newbe]
first lesson in Javascript scope by explaining 'this'.
Tolerant, isn't it?
I still do not understand the OQ about swinging rookies.
Should we have pointed her to alt.dancing.fifties.unmoderated?
Evertjan. said the following on 11/26/2007 5:49 PM:
Hmmm. So, if a person ask about PERL, and someone points them to a PERL
group, then the reply is off-topic? Wow.
In a sense it is, because the OQ is off topic.
Pointing an off topic Q's OP in ther right direction
makes a NG a general Q-aire,
and that's what Netiquette in it's ancient wisdom tries to prevent.
But I tried to give the OP his
[his?, not even a nickname to suggest the binary type of newbe]
first lesson in Javascript scope by explaining 'this'.
Tolerant, isn't it?
I still do not understand the OQ about swinging rookies.
Should we have pointed her to alt.dancing.fifties.unmoderated?
2
2apart
Evertjan. said the following on 11/26/2007 5:49 PM:
Hmmm. So, if a person ask about PERL, and someone points them to a PERL
group, then the reply is off-topic? Wow.
--
Randy
Chance Favors The Prepared Mind
comp.lang.javascript FAQ -http://jibbering.com/faq/index.html
Javascript Best Practices -http://www.JavascriptToolbox.com/bestpractices/
It was to the nature of the answer.
Anyway, thank you Kailash Nadh.
2
2apart
Randy Webb wrote on 27 nov 2007 in comp.lang.javascript:
Hmmm. So, if a person ask about PERL, and someone points them to a PERL
group, then the reply is off-topic? Wow.
In a sense it is, because the OQ is off topic.
Pointing an off topic Q's OP in ther right direction
makes a NG a general Q-aire,
and that's what Netiquette in it's ancient wisdom tries to prevent.
But I tried to give the OP his
[his?, not even a nickname to suggest the binary type of newbe]
first lesson in Javascript scope by explaining 'this'.
Tolerant, isn't it?
I still do not understand the OQ about swinging rookies.
Should we have pointed her to alt.dancing.fifties.unmoderated?
Baseball. You think this string can do 50? Thanks Evertjan in the
Netherlands.
Can't wait to ask my first question!
R
RobG
Before you do, please learn not to quote signatures. Everything from
the line containing "-- " and afterward should be automatically
removed from quotes, if not by your news reader then by you.
The Google groups interface doesn't do it automatically, so replies
posted from Google groups often contain the signature because the
poster is either unaware that they should be trimmed or can't be
bothered to do it.
In any case, quotes in replies should be trimmed to just what you are
replying to, you shouldn't automatically quote the entire previous
message. Notes on posting are included in the FAQ:
<URL: http://www.jibbering.com/faq/faq_notes/clj_posts.html#ps1Post >