JKop bashing thread

J

JKop

Though this thread is off-topic, I feel that it will make the rest of
the entire newsgroup more on-topic by confining the JKop bashing to this
one thread.

So... bash away!

I'm going to be reading the replies, so if there's anything credible
there, I'll be happy to respond!


-JKop
 
C

chris

JKop said:
Though this thread is off-topic, I feel that it will make the rest of
the entire newsgroup more on-topic by confining the JKop bashing to this
one thread.

So... bash away!

I'm going to be reading the replies, so if there's anything credible
there, I'll be happy to respond!

OK, heres a question. Can you point me to a thread or two for which you
deserve some bashing? The only slightly dodgy thing I remember reading
was the "Microsoft are fools, they don't know what a polymorphic type"
thread is, on which I agree with you at least partly (but feel the urge
to defend Microsoft occasionally, just to annoy linux obsessives).

Chris
 
J

JKop

OK, heres a question. Can you point me to a thread or two for which you
deserve some bashing? The only slightly dodgy thing I remember reading
was the "Microsoft are fools, they don't know what a polymorphic type"
thread is, on which I agree with you at least partly (but feel the urge
to defend Microsoft occasionally, just to annoy linux obsessives).

Chris


Well I get the odd insult now and again, plus that latest thread where the
fella proposed myself for a prestigious award.

Just seems to me that if people are going to be derogatory toward me, then
they should be open about why exactly they are so - otherwise, I advise them
that other than satisfying their own personal pleasures, they're wasting
their time.

Plus, if I'm rreeaallyy honest, this is fun!


-JKop
 
D

DaKoadMunky

I find the manner in which you communicate at times to be very immature and
unprofessional.

You have made statements similar to the following...

"Why the **** does C++ do it this way? It is so fucking stupid!"

"Only a shit compiler would allow this to compile. It is bullshit"

I find such a manner of communicating to be very unpleasant. If you speak like
you write then I would be hesistant to work with you.

Basically it comes across as arrogance without the knowledge to back it up.

I believe that your interest in C++ and your growing knowledge of C++ could
make you a valued member of this group or a development team.

All you gotta do is lose the attitude.
 
J

JKop

DaKoadMunky posted:
I find the manner in which you communicate at times to be very immature
and unprofessional.

You have made statements similar to the following...

"Why the **** does C++ do it this way? It is so fucking stupid!"

"Only a shit compiler would allow this to compile. It is bullshit"

I find such a manner of communicating to be very unpleasant. If you
speak like you write then I would be hesistant to work with you.

Basically it comes across as arrogance without the knowledge to back it
up.

I believe that your interest in C++ and your growing knowledge of C++
could make you a valued member of this group or a development team.

All you gotta do is lose the attitude.


I see what you're getting at here, and to be honest, I do actually think
twice before posting a word like "****" to a newsgroup. It really just
depends on the way one is interpreted. For instance, it wouldn't be uncommon
for myself, in a social context, to react in disbelief with the exclamation
"**** off!", as in:

Some-one: He sold the car -- he got EUR 4,000 for it.

Me: **** Off!


Now, in my opinion this really has to do with social context. I often hear
the argument, "People who curse are exhibiting their lack of intelligence
and inferior vocabulary.". This makes a little bit of sense to me and in a
professional context, I do strive to find a non-slang word for what I want
to express (for instance, some-one recently referred to my comments as
"vacuous", which is in obvious alternative to "fucking stupid").
I do see the merit in being more professional like this, but the more I buy
into it, the more I see that there really is a use for cursing, it just
depends on the context. I used to post the likes of "This is a farce.", but
really I'm sort-of lying about what I'm trying to express. The phrase "This
is bullshit.", while equally getting the point across, also gives an insight
into my disposition. So I think to myself, if I explicitly, consciously use
"big words" over curses, am I really just being coerced (even bullied) into
expressing myself in a way in which other people will like? I haven't really
decided yet. At the moment, I'm experimenting a little.

I just have to add that when I see other people here curse a little, like
Ron Natalie, who says the likes of "This is retarded." from time to time, it
alters my perception of the group and the whole social context. At the
beginning, when I started posting to such an "upper-class" newsgroup like
this, I was purely in the mindset that, if I were to curse, I'd just be
exhibiting stupidity and immaturity. But now, I'm thinking more along the
lines of expressing myself openly and accurately. Just because I'm a
proficient programmer doesn't mean I've to bare the social stigma attached
to it - that is, that I must be "professional". Also, one does not have to
be "professional" in order to be "intelligent". The film "Good Will
Hunting" tries to conveys this.


Regarding:
I find such a manner of communicating to be very unpleasant. If you
speak like you write then I would be hesistant to work with you.

This is exactly the kind of thing that encourages me to be more
"professional". If we were all to use our own colloquialisms, then the text
in this newsgroup would be unintelligible; as such, we use the common
denominator: "official" English. But the truth of the matter in my opinion
is that there's more to conversation than "official" language. I find that
the odd curse works will to set the tone (eg. light-hearted) and to express
our actual personality openly.

I'm not a hostile person. I won't express unwarranted aggression toward a
person for absoultely no reason. Perhaps what's going on is that people who
are of different social background to me interpret my cursing as "hostile"
and thus interpret myself as "hostile"?

I just think it's better to be professional and to honestly and openly
express yourself, rather than to simply be professional.


-JKop
 
P

Patrick Kowalzick

Hi JKop,

Do you have kind of dictionary to translate from "professional, honestly and
openly c.l.c++-english" to "simply professional c.l.c++-english"?

Something like:

This is bullshit. - You are a **** ****. And really stupid.
This is bullshit. - You are absolutly wrong. See Standard and Stroustoup.
This is bullshit. - You might be wrong, but I have to investigate further.
This is bullshit. - I always did it in a different fashion.
This is bullshit. - I have no clue at all.

Bullshit,
Patrick

P.S.: Is bashing off-topic ?
 
J

JKop

Patrick Kowalzick posted:
Hi JKop,

Do you have kind of dictionary to translate from "professional,
honestly and openly c.l.c++-english" to "simply professional
c.l.c++-english"?

Something like:

This is bullshit. - You are a **** ****. And really stupid.
This is bullshit. - You are absolutly wrong. See Standard and
Stroustoup. This is bullshit. - You might be wrong, but I have to
investigate further. This is bullshit. - I always did it in a different
fashion. This is bullshit. - I have no clue at all.

Bullshit,
Patrick

P.S.: Is bashing off-topic ?



Rhetorical questions don't do much.


-JKop
 
J

Jonathan Turkanis

JKop said:
Though this thread is off-topic, I feel that it will make the rest of
the entire newsgroup more on-topic by confining the JKop bashing to this
one thread.

So... bash away!

Maybe the best solution would be for you to study a couple of good C++ books,
pick a new alias, and start fresh. ... Unless your name is really "JKop." Or is
it "NULL"?

Jonathan
 
J

Jonathan Turkanis

JKop said:
Though this thread is off-topic, I feel that it will make the rest of
the entire newsgroup more on-topic by confining the JKop bashing to this
one thread.

So... bash away!

Maybe the best solution would be for you to study a couple of good C++ books,
pick a new alias, and start fresh. ... Unless your name is really "JKop." Or is
it "NULL"?

Jonathan
 
J

JKop

Jonathan Turkanis posted:
Maybe the best solution would be for you to study a couple of good C++
books, pick a new alias, and start fresh. ... Unless your name is
really "JKop." Or is it "NULL"?

Jonathan


"JKop" is what we call a pseudonym.


"NULL" I believe is defined in <stddef>.


-JKop
 
J

Jonathan Turkanis

Maybe the best solution would be for you to study a couple of good C++ books,
pick a new alias, and start fresh. ... Unless your name is really "JKop." Or is
it "NULL"?

Sorry for the duplicate message ... duplicate message ... duplicate message ...
 
J

John Harrison

JKop said:
Though this thread is off-topic, I feel that it will make the rest of
the entire newsgroup more on-topic by confining the JKop bashing to this
one thread.

So... bash away!

I'm going to be reading the replies, so if there's anything credible
there, I'll be happy to respond!


-JKop

I think you could pick a better variable name than poo. I liked it when you
used animal names.

john
 
S

Simon

chris said:
OK, heres a question. Can you point me to a thread or two for which you
deserve some bashing?

I will:

o http://tinyurl.com/6pu58
o http://tinyurl.com/3vtwb
o http://tinyurl.com/4lfnb
o http://tinyurl.com/4ahkn

I'm sure there are more, but I don't have the time.

The kid needs to grow up, lose his arrogant, obnoxious attitude and
learn responsibility.

In any case, I'm sure he'll look back on his posts in 10 years from
now and laugh (and feel embarrased) at how immature he was back then.
 
R

Rolf Magnus

JKop said:
Jonathan Turkanis posted:



"JKop" is what we call a pseudonym.

Yes, and a pseudonym is what many usenet users call impolite. The problem is
that many use a pseudonym because they don't want their "good" name to be
connected to what thay write on usenet. So a pseudonym in combination with
a fake e-mail address is a red flag to many usenet users.
"NULL" I believe is defined in <stddef>.

Right. However, it is not defined as a valid - or invalid - toplevel domain.
 
F

Frederic Banaszak

Rolf Magnus said:
Yes, and a pseudonym is what many usenet users call impolite. The problem is
that many use a pseudonym because they don't want their "good" name to be
connected to what thay write on usenet. So a pseudonym in combination with
a fake e-mail address is a red flag to many usenet users.

On the other hand, how do we know your name is really Rolf Magnus? And
furthermore, why should we care?

I'm not trying to pick a fight here, and I'm certainly not trying to
defend "JKop", but does it really matter what someone calls himself?

A person should not be be judged by their screen name but by the
content of their character (with apologies to MLK).
 
M

Mabden

JKop said:
Patrick Kowalzick posted:

In my experience of using "bad" language all the time, I have found that
a curse word allows the person you are talking to to dismiss your point
out of hand. They can choose to make their particular "I'm outa here"
noise and/or gesture and quit the discussion. And they can then run to
the nearest spectator with a loud, "Did you just hear what I heard?!!!"
This allows the onlookers and the "offended" person to hold the "moral
high ground" and by default win the argument, in their eyes.

By using inoffensive, alternate words you stave off the automatic loss
due to process, and remove an opponent's immediate victory by your
default. And that may make a difference when the excrement hits the fan.

Rhetorical questions don't do much.

Do you mean that?
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,183
Messages
2,570,967
Members
47,518
Latest member
RomanGratt

Latest Threads

Top