M
Michael Wojcik
Nope. Must be differences in our readers. I'm using xpdf, you're using
acroread.
But Vlad seems to be using acroread (7) as well. Maybe they mucked
that up since your version?
Huh. Wierd.
This was discussed at least as recently as last December, when Larry
Jones noted that at least some versions of the PDF include "a very
think space between the two underscores" for readability purposes.[1]
It's possible that different readers - including different versions
of Acrobeast Reaver - handle that "very thin space" character
differently for searching and copying purposes. Some may treat it as
a space when reducing to ASCII, and others may treat it as
typographical leading[2] and ignore it.
It's also possible that ANSI has played around with the PDF contents
in ways that don't alter the wording of the standard, so that
different versions of the document exist. Though my copy of ISO/IEC
9899-1999(E), ANSI PDF version, downloaded 2005-10-06 (the ANSI store
inserts purchase information onto the cover page of downloaded PDFs)
matches what Al, Pete, and Mark reported.
My copy of the N1124 PDF, on the other hand, doesn't find "__"
anywhere - all the double-underscores have the thin-leading insertion.
1. http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.c/msg/38e222522db1d348
2. That's "leading" as in the soft metal, in other words, not as in
"coming in front".