D
dorayme
cwdjrxyz said:On Aug 18, 7:31 pm, dorayme <[email protected]> wrote:
The meta must be self closed (<blah />) in xhtml as must img etc,
since everything must be closed in xhtml. If you serve the xhtml page
properly as application/xhtml+xml the xml parser of the browser rather
than the html one is used. Then the usual response is to give you an
error message rather than a view of the page.
It seems IE8 is yet another IE browser that will not conform to
standards, even when simple 4.01 Strict is used.
I was not wanting to have anything to do with xhtml, never mind xhtml +
xml. I am very frightened of both individually and the two together
simply petrifies me.
On my previous tests, sticking the slashed avoider in a conditional
comment for IE only, even though it was not the first tag among the tags
in the head, caused browsershots to display the layout in IE8 in the
same way as in IE7 and IE6 and FF etc rather in the ghastly manner it
did without the secret tag that Harlan has revealed.
<http://dorayme.890m.com/alt/ie8/ie8_withMetaSlashConditional.html>
(The peace with IE6 was an illusion, btw, bug avoiding devices are yet
to be inserted, IE plays up badly on narrow browser widths. <g>)