string and objects

[Guest]

So do I, more likely your statistics software is miscounting
"visits".  You might find the following article interesting:

<URL:http://virtuelvis.com/archives/2005/05/statistics-nonsense>

My stats come from my web space provider, they collate all this stuff
FOC, so thats why its probably dodgy
still, it keeps me entertained looking at it!

Put your script into an external script file, then validate at:

<URL:http://validator.w3.org/>

Thanks for that, showed up quite a few errors.

 

[Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn]

I'm a big fan of IEs4Linux, even have their easter-egg version installed
(Hint: Use the Source, Luke).

However, I have run across one instance where it was using slightly
different DLLs than "Real" install of IE6.  I /think/ the real version of
IE6 was behind a patch level for something, but its been long enough I
don't recall.

ACK. I have the particular problem that my IE 7.0 from IEs4Linux
runs, but it just doesn't navigate. Loading a Web site takes forever,
and nothing is displayed in the viewport at all. I tried reinstalling
the newest beta, tried even the IE6 proxy settings hack, but to no
avail. If anyone solved this problem, please help. TIA.


PointedEars

 

[Garrett Smith]

kangax wrote: [...]

Were you ever concerned about such "memory hog"?

No, as I think of these Function objects as rather small in memory.
But I
might be mistaken.

Have you, perhaps, performed any tests on this matter?
No.

I'm curious if this issue is significant enough to worry about.

Add me. But how does one *reliably* detect if there are memory issues?

I published an article on a subject of named function expressions a
couple of days ago
<http://yura.thinkweb2.com/named-function-expressions/>. There are some
tests related to JScript issue we discuss here. You might be interested
to look at them.

I'm also open to any suggestions/corrections, of course.

There is no need to use an empty statement following a FunctionDeclaration.

You've taken APE.dom.contains[1], renamed it to "contans" and did not
mention where the code came from and you know exactly where it came from
and we have discussed that in email from about 6 weeks ago.
http://github.com/GarrettS/ape-java...c2400b1212d8297e76/src/dom/traversal-f.js#L22
Thats copyright violation.

I don't feel like reviewing much more of that, for reasons which should
be obvious.

I'm not quite sure what your problem is. You seem to want to keep it a
secret.

Garrett

 

[Garrett Smith]

kangax wrote: [...]

I'm also open to any suggestions/corrections, of course.

There is no need to use an empty statement following a
FunctionDeclaration.

You've taken APE.dom.contains[1], renamed it to "contans" and did not
mention where the code came from and you know exactly where it came from

Garrett, I did not rename anything. I did take `contains` "as is" from
APE of course. I should have mentioned where it is taken from but

Yes.

// (GS) contans?
var contans = (function() {
var docEl = document.documentElement;

if (typeof docEl.compareDocumentPosition != 'undefined') {
return function(el, b) {
return (el.compareDocumentPosition(b) & 16) !== 0;
}
}
else if (typeof docEl.contains != 'undefined') {
return function(el, b) {
return el !== b && el.contains(b);
}
}
return function(el, b) {
if (el === b) return false;
// (GS) Should use !==.
while (el != b && (b = b.parentNode) != null);
return el === b;
}
})() // (GS) don't rely on automatic semicolon insertion.

[...]

Please, let me know if there are any other oversights.

Time to go the the gym.

Garrett

 

[Andrew Poulos]

Garrett Smith wrote:

<snip>^^^^^^^^

This reads as if there is an unofficial group FAQ somewhere.

How do know there isn't?

Andrew Poulos