Test::Unit Reports

M

M. Edward (Ed) Borasky

Eleanor said:
Well that's one of the least-informative googles I've ever performed.
Not even an "Hello World"...


Ellie

Eleanor McHugh
Games With Brains
Go to Addall.com and do an out-of-print book search for it. The
publisher is Academic Press. I actually have a copy of it, but I don't
remember where it is at the moment. It's a collector's item.
 
M

M. Edward (Ed) Borasky

Robert said:
Italian, definitely Italian because Puccini, Bellini and Donizetti
will never go away, and some like Verdi too, but do not tell my French
wife. Well 574km/h is an achievement though, well done. (I am talking
about the train ;)
Robert
Neither will Rameau, Bizet, Berlioz, Poulenc, Tchaikovsky, Mussorgsky,
Shostakovich, Wagner, Richard Strauss, Britten, Bolcomb, Gershwin, Adams
or Tan Dun. :)

Trains -- well, there it's back to French or Japanese, I think. ;)
 
E

Eleanor McHugh

Go to Addall.com and do an out-of-print book search for it. The
publisher is Academic Press. I actually have a copy of it, but I
don't remember where it is at the moment. It's a collector's item.

I'll have to pick up a copy next time I have time for some light
reading. The mentions of it being similar to APL are intriguing -
that's one of the few languages I've met that I've not been able to
get into.


Ellie

Eleanor McHugh
Games With Brains
 
E

Eleanor McHugh

Trains -- well, there it's back to French or Japanese, I think. ;)

Everything since Trevithick is just an implementation detail ;p

Ellie

Eleanor McHugh
Games With Brains
 
J

John Joyce

There is more than "hearing" alone. It has to do with the way signals
clip in vacuum tube based amplifiers.
They tend to do so more gracefully and organically. They naturally
compress a signal rather than just going straight from signal to
square wave.
Vacuum tube stuff is closely related to the physics in RF (radio
frequency) stuff. Take a look at the old books on the technology.
It's intense stuff.
Companies still do make tube-based audio equipment for precisely the
performance qualities they exhibit. Not only guitar amplifiers and
audio-phile equipment, also studio recording equipment and sound test
equipment as well as high-power amplification equipment (radio,
radar, microwave transmission)
consumer tubes used to have a bad reputation, but mil-spec (military
grade) tubes last a long time and do their jobs well.

If you can't hear the difference, I can understand with a stereo, but
ask any musician, they know and will tell you. They generally do
sound better but not always. Every component matters. Certain
capacitor materials, wire guages, wood used in cabinets, etc...
it all matters.

Much like choosing the right library for a parser.
 
I

I. P.

|Eleanor McHugh|
EM> Well that's one of the least-informative googles I've ever performed.
EM> Not even an "Hello World"...
Well at least I've learned that "l'yapas" in Ukrainian means "slap on
the face".

LYAPAS was created in 1967 by Belarusian scientist Arkadiy Zakrevsky
for describing IC later proceeded by CAD software (automating tracing
tasks). Language itself was given informally and contained about 400
commands. In a few years it was replaced by LYAPAS-M.

So - no "Hello, world!" I'm afraid.
 
E

Eleanor McHugh

|Eleanor McHugh|

EM> Well that's one of the least-informative googles I've ever
performed.
EM> Not even an "Hello World"...
Well at least I've learned that "l'yapas" in Ukrainian means "slap on
the face".

LYAPAS was created in 1967 by Belarusian scientist Arkadiy Zakrevsky
for describing IC later proceeded by CAD software (automating tracing
tasks). Language itself was given informally and contained about 400
commands. In a few years it was replaced by LYAPAS-M.

So - no "Hello, world!" I'm afraid.

Thanks for the additional info :)
I have this ambition of one day knowing every coding language ever
devised... only about 7500 of them to go >;p


Ellie

Eleanor McHugh
Games With Brains
 
M

M. Edward (Ed) Borasky

John said:
There is more than "hearing" alone. It has to do with the way signals
clip in vacuum tube based amplifiers.
They tend to do so more gracefully and organically. They naturally
compress a signal rather than just going straight from signal to
square wave.
Vacuum tube stuff is closely related to the physics in RF (radio
frequency) stuff. Take a look at the old books on the technology. It's
intense stuff.
Companies still do make tube-based audio equipment for precisely the
performance qualities they exhibit. Not only guitar amplifiers and
audio-phile equipment, also studio recording equipment and sound test
equipment as well as high-power amplification equipment (radio, radar,
microwave transmission)
consumer tubes used to have a bad reputation, but mil-spec (military
grade) tubes last a long time and do their jobs well.

If you can't hear the difference, I can understand with a stereo, but
ask any musician, they know and will tell you. They generally do sound
better but not always. Every component matters. Certain capacitor
materials, wire guages, wood used in cabinets, etc...
it all matters.

Much like choosing the right library for a parser.
Yes ... to a professional musician/audio engineer ... who has been
careful not to damage his ears with high decibel levels ... below a
certain age ... in the absence of disease ... etc. It *used* to matter
to me. :)
 
M

M. Edward (Ed) Borasky

Eleanor said:
I'll have to pick up a copy next time I have time for some light
reading. The mentions of it being similar to APL are intriguing -
that's one of the few languages I've met that I've not been able to
get into.


Ellie

Eleanor McHugh
Games With Brains
It is similar to APL in two ways:

1. It is almost unreadable
2. There are operations that deal with whole arrays

To me, Report Program Generator (RPG) made more sense. :)
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
474,239
Messages
2,571,200
Members
47,840
Latest member
Tiffany471

Latest Threads

Top