The IDE question

[Ville Vainio]

Jarek> No, it's perfectly legal.

Jarek> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#TOCGPLIncompatibleLibs

So it seems. You live, you learn .

 

[pitkali]

Windows versions are named, royalty-free, commercial licenses.
[... long, tortuous explanation ...] Hallo, any lawyers around here?

As he said, "way too messy"!

I am not sure if Detlev can pose such exceptions... Well, Qt-and-around
is not an easy shoot.

He hold the copyright (with Phil Thompson). He is the licensor. He can do
all he wants.

Regards,

 

[Jarek Zgoda]

Windows versions are named, royalty-free, commercial licenses.
[... long, tortuous explanation ...] Hallo, any lawyers around
here?

As he said, "way too messy"!

I am not sure if Detlev can pose such exceptions... Well,
Qt-and-around is not an easy shoot.

He hold the copyright (with Phil Thompson). He is the licensor. He can
do all he wants.

Don't think it's possible to claim "software is GPL but you cann't
distribute it". Either don't pose such restriction or use another
license.