use of CSS in CGI generated docs, Impossible ?

[navid.boarder]

Thanks Axel, best help ever in this topic. it worked finally ! ! ! ! !
! ! !! ! ! !

Thanks everybody i guess here I end this topic



cheers, thanks for participation. Special thanks to Alex.


be cool

 

[Gunnar Hjalmarsson]

Thanks everybody i guess here I end this topic

Nobody can end a topic in a Usenet group. A thread is ended only when
nobody replies any longer. Not that I believe that the OP in this thread
cares, but I thought I'd mention it in an attempt to prevent that
somebody else adopts his confused attitude to Usenet.

 

[Matt Garrish]

I knew I should ask my question in CGI group, dummies. But there is not
such a group in english, there's only one in german.

Ignorance must be bliss: comp.infosystems.www.authoring.cgi

and if i do CGI and i donot find CGI group i'll find a perl group
because i am doing CGI in perl, like i did.

Which doesn't mean your question has anything to do with Perl.

<BREAKING NEWS> fortunate you all were, I just found a group called
perl.beginners.cgi and i am finding my answers there. just wish i get
my answers otherwise i'll get more nasty with you.

Phew! I was getting worried, for one.

So long Tad, Sherm, Sinan (SINAN means what?) , Red Brick and Todd.

No need to show us what a twat you are; we'd already guessed.

Matt

 

[Alan J. Flavell]

Well, hash in the UK, the pound sign in America.

Unicode has a reference name for every character. In an international
forum, it's surely advisable to lean heavily on an international
notation (which, by the way, is my objection to US-specific date
formats, which are so often misunderstood anywhere else).

http://www.unicode.org/charts/
http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0000.pdf
http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0080.pdf

At least in *this* context I'd be confident of readers understanding
what a "hash" is, even though that's not its formal Unicode name.
But given that "pound sign" is the formal name of U+00A3 - the pound
sterling currency sign - it would be a mistake to use that term to
mean anything different.

Many UK keyboards have an actual pound sign in place of
the hash...

You mean US keyboards have an actual hash sign in place of the pound.
Ho hum.

of course most people in the UK have no reason to use the hash key,

On the contrary: it's one of the buttons on a telephone dial pad, and
often needed for instructing users on what to press in such an
everyday context.

But that's OK, I don't even need to hold down the shift key to get one
on the keyboard (it's just to the left of the carriage return key -
same key as the tilde ;-).

Google suggests http://www.goodtyping.com/teclatUK.htm


............................octothorp, mumble.

 

[Tad McClellan]

(SINAN means what?)

navid means what?

 

[A. Sinan Unur]

If the OP were this dedicated to actually understanding his problem,
rather than getting obsessed with my national origin, and my name, he
might actually learn something.

Pity ...

Sinan

PS: Thanks, Tad. If it weren't for you, I would not have seen this post.

 

[usenet]

<BREAKING NEWS> fortunate you all were, I just found a group called
perl.beginners.cgi and i am finding my answers there.

OH NO!!!!! We lost another one to perl.beginners.cgi

 

[A. Sinan Unur]

(e-mail address removed) wrote in @fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk:

What notation?

I was actually trying to remember what to call "new CGI" as opposed to
CGI->new. Todd W. reminded me the term "indirect object".

Well, hash in the UK, the pound sign in America.

I knew I should have kept my mouth shut. )

Sinan

 

[Tad McClellan]

OH NO!!!!! We lost another one to perl.beginners.cgi

I don't see that we've lost anything of value.

 

[usenet]

I don't see that we've lost anything of value.

Nor do I see that the OP has gotten any answers in that group. P.B.C
has accumulated only 11 posts in the entire month of November (and only
six have responses). But I did happen to notice that Randal
occasionally posts in that group, so the OP might get lucky (provided
he changes his handle and attitude, of course).

 

[Anno Siegel]

If that had been the case, wouldn't the CGI POD have mentioned it?

use CGI();
BEGIN { $::symbols = keys %CGI:: }

use CGI;

print "With parens: $::symbols\n",
'Without parens: ', scalar keys %CGI::, "\n";

Outputs:
With parens: 86
Without parens: 87

....but that isn't the point. You want to check what CGI.pm imports into
*your* namespace. The relevant check would be

package Clear;
use CGI; # with or without ()
print scalar keys %Clear::, "\n";

However, like a good module, CGI.pm exports nothing by default, so the
parens make no difference. "use CGI qw( :standard)" imports 160+ symbols,
which would be something to worry about.

Anno

 

[A. Sinan Unur]

(e-mail address removed)-berlin.de (Anno Siegel) wrote in

like a good module, CGI.pm exports nothing by default,

....

Until this thread, I had incorrectly assumed that the names in :standard
were automatically exported if nothing was specified. I'll go bang my head
against a wall a little now.

Sinan

 

[Jürgen Exner]

I knew I should ask my question in CGI group, dummies. But there is
not such a group in english, there's only one in german.

You may want to ask you ISP to provide comp.infosystems.www.authoring.cgi.
That NG is mentioned in several FAQs and very frequently in this NG, too.

jue