J
Jerry Coffin
(e-mail address removed)>, (e-mail address removed)
says...
[ ... ]
Probably because a pointer to a function is a special type of thing
that's not necessarily compatible with a pointer to an object.
says...
[ ... ]
I wonder why they excepted function definitions as objects?
Probably because a pointer to a function is a special type of thing
that's not necessarily compatible with a pointer to an object.