David said:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty said:
[David Segall wrote:]
I just don't see a problem with the W3C page and I would be stunned
if they included content that would be difficult to read using
Internet Explorer.
And again, this is because they cheat and send a content-type of
text/html, which is something IE can comprehend.
So why did you state that 'The amusing part of that page is that
58.3% of visitors will be asked if they want to "download the page."
<lol>'? That was the _only_ thing I disagreed with in this
sub-thread.
So, you are only disagreeing with my bit of humor? You agree with the
fact that properly-served XHTML can't be seen by IE; and the premise
that the world is not ready for XHTML.
You didn't answer that question. <g>