Which spec to use?

D

David Segall

And again, this is because they cheat and send a content-type of
text/html, which is something IE can comprehend.

So why did you state that 'The amusing part of that page is that 58.3%
of visitors will be asked if they want to "download the page." <lol>'?
That was the _only_ thing I disagreed with in this sub-thread.
 
B

Beauregard T. Shagnasty

David said:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty said:
[David Segall wrote:]
I just don't see a problem with the W3C page and I would be stunned
if they included content that would be difficult to read using
Internet Explorer.

And again, this is because they cheat and send a content-type of
text/html, which is something IE can comprehend.

So why did you state that 'The amusing part of that page is that
58.3% of visitors will be asked if they want to "download the page."
<lol>'? That was the _only_ thing I disagreed with in this
sub-thread.

So, you are only disagreeing with my bit of humor? You agree with the
fact that properly-served XHTML can't be seen by IE; and the premise
that the world is not ready for XHTML.

You didn't answer that question. <g>
 
D

David Segall

Beauregard T. Shagnasty said:
David said:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty said:
[David Segall wrote:]
I just don't see a problem with the W3C page and I would be stunned
if they included content that would be difficult to read using
Internet Explorer.

And again, this is because they cheat and send a content-type of
text/html, which is something IE can comprehend.

So why did you state that 'The amusing part of that page is that
58.3% of visitors will be asked if they want to "download the page."
<lol>'? That was the _only_ thing I disagreed with in this
sub-thread.

So, you are only disagreeing with my bit of humor? You agree with the
fact that properly-served XHTML can't be seen by IE; and the premise
that the world is not ready for XHTML.

You didn't answer that question. <g>
 
K

Kenneth Tilton

John said:
This could be the key I've been missing to let me unlock the door to
true enlightenment. I think I will add this to my .sig, and meditate on
the meaning of it. :)

The waffling "may be" resonates nicely with the cowardice. :)

kt
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,082
Messages
2,570,589
Members
47,211
Latest member
Shamestone

Latest Threads

Top