P
paul watt
1001 Webs said:
why on earth should he tell you what uni he's at. None of your bloody
buisness mate.
Chad, just killfile this muppet, hes not worth your time
why on earth should he tell you what uni he's at. None of your bloody
buisness mate.
Chad, just killfile this muppet, hes not worth your time
P
paul watt
KarlCore said:
only 90% mate?
1
1001 Webs
I had a look at that site, frankly, I left before it even had time to
load. I'm only on a dial-up conection and did not want to waste time
waiting for some stupid looking Flash driven web movie to load!!.
If you really want to help anyone with a disability, then you should
just stick with plain old HTML, after all that is what it was created
for, to make documents accessable to anyone who required them.
http://groups.google.com.au/group/a...ssible+Flash+Websites&rnum=2#17ab6a70609297dd
D
dorayme
"paul watt said:
Chad, I kf'd this creep ages ago; so he must be *real* bad...
<g>. So follow the advice rf and paul are giving you.
(just btw, Chad, I always read our posts with an especially acute
ear for anything to do with accessibility, All such things are
greatly appreciated. You should do more of it! And also btw, I
had a blind student once who was the most brilliant of all the
students in that particular year and went on to hold down big
jobs and contribute in big ways to community life in NSW. And a
former partner of mine used to work for the Royal Blind Society
and it is an organization much to be respected. I can barely
stand hearing that web1000 creep talking to you like this!)
K
KarlCore
Yeah. There's an assault & battery on there from 1991. :-(
It was put on the "stet" docket, which means it was basically
dismissed as long as I didn't get in more trouble. I could petition to
have it expunged if I wanted, but who cares at this point. Anyone who
holds a fight I got into 16 years ago against me isn't worth dealing
with anyway.
Karl
1
1001 Webs
"Flash used in it's most common form makes very hard to decrease and
increase font sizes to make for easyer reading for those of us with
low vision. "
http://groups.google.com.au/group/a...628128a5?lnk=st&q=disability#ac3f57e6628128a5
Please note how Chaddy says "those of us with low vision".
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The following is the World Health Organisation's definition of low
vision.
This is widely used internationally.
A person with low vision is one who has impairment of visual
functioning even after:
- treatment, for example an operation and/or standard refractive
correction (has been given glasses or lenses)
- and has a visual acuity of less than 6/18 to light perception, or
- a visual field of less than 10° from the point of fixation (i.e. 20°
across)
- but who uses, or is potentially able to use, vision for the planning
and/or execution (doing it!) of a task
http://www.lowvisiononline.unimelb.edu.au/Screening/refractive.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In North America and most of Europe, legal blindness is defined as
visual acuity (vision) of 20/200 (6/60) or less in the better eye with
best correction possible. This means that a legally blind individual
would have to stand 20 feet from an object to see it with the same
degree of clarity as a normally sighted person could from 200 feet. In
many areas, people with average acuity who nonetheless have a visual
field of less than 20 degrees (the norm being 180 degrees) are also
classified as being legally blind.
Approximately ten percent of those deemed legally blind, by any
measure, are fully sightless. The rest have some vision, from light
perception alone to relatively good acuity.
Those who are not legally blind, but nonetheless have serious visual
impairments, possess low vision.
http://www.k12academics.com/blind.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
READ THIS!!
http://www.nfbnet.org/pipermail/gui-talk/2003-May/002424.html
It's a little old as I am now heading in to my third year at
university but I think you'll get the point, unless your as cluless as
you appear to be!.
BTW where not por vonerable people YOU STUPID GIT!
application of a brain suggests the interpretation "we are not poor
vulnerable people".
So, I repeat my question:
We ???
Is he trying to make us think that he represents blind people ???
Isn't he being a bit misleading?
Does he show any consideration whatsoever for those who are in a worse
condition than he is by producing non-accessible content in a web-site
that claims to "specialise in making websites that are accessible to
the widest range of people possible":?
http://freewebdesign.awardspace.biz/index.php
but then goes on to say that "you will need the Flash Player to *view*
the below content":
http://freewebdesign.awardspace.biz/portfolio.php
Is he not basically asking for compassion, while at the same time
denying accessibility to the people he claims to be helping.?
Perhaps because he knows that he can't get any money out of those
people?
Is there more than a 0% chance that he is what he claims to be. ?
J
Jerry Stuckle
dorayme said:
Oh, he's even worse than you think. How about this email he sent to one
of the organizations I belong to...
I think you should know that your member Jerry Stuckle who advertises as
the MD of JDS Computer Training Corp. at your page:
http://www.icca.org/member/memberpage.asp?id=400 is not telling the
truth. There's no such corporation. The JDS Computer company that
existed was forfeited in 1996. The other company that Jerry Stuckle is
principal of is Smartech, which has been forfeited last year by the
Maryland Taxpayer Services Division: http://www.maryland.gov/ click on
Business Database Searches:
http://sdatcert3.resiusa.org/UCC-Charter/default.aspx
Of course, the first thing they did was call me and ask me who was this
guy. I just explained he's a sociopath who seems obsessed with me.
They know the status of my businesses. And they know where both
corporations are registered
He really is a sad case. I hope he gets help soon.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
(e-mail address removed)
==================
J
Jerry Stuckle
I probably shouldn't add that we got a good laugh out of it. But I will
.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
(e-mail address removed)
==================
.--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
(e-mail address removed)
==================
D
dE|_
"1001 Webs" proved
http://wiki.answers.com:80/Q/How_do_you_know_if_someone_is_a_sociopath
Point 3; Grandiose Sense of Self
http://wiki.answers.com:80/Q/How_do_you_know_if_someone_is_a_sociopath
Point 3; Grandiose Sense of Self
A
asdf
[snip]
Words/phrases you used:
- "special"
- "normal"
- "vulnerable"
- "they're all very considerate, polite and respectful"
What a load of hogwash, my friend.
Like me, I suspect that most blind or vision impaired people find this kind
of drivel pretty offensive. Vision impaired people do not have superhuman
powers, and would prefer to be treated with the respect afforded other
members of the community, and NOT be subjected to this outmoded patronising
parody of pity which you present above.
....and please, please, please... stop crossposting.
[snip]
Words/phrases you used:
- "special"
- "normal"
- "vulnerable"
- "they're all very considerate, polite and respectful"
What a load of hogwash, my friend.
Like me, I suspect that most blind or vision impaired people find this kind
of drivel pretty offensive. Vision impaired people do not have superhuman
powers, and would prefer to be treated with the respect afforded other
members of the community, and NOT be subjected to this outmoded patronising
parody of pity which you present above.
....and please, please, please... stop crossposting.
1
1001 Webs
dorayme said:Oh, he's even worse than you think. How about this email he sent to one
of the organizations I belong to...
I think you should know that your member Jerry Stuckle who advertises as
the MD of JDS Computer Training Corp. at your page:http://www.icca.org/member/memberpage.asp?id=400is not telling the
truth. There's no such corporation. The JDS Computer company that
existed was forfeited in 1996. The other company that Jerry Stuckle is
principal of is Smartech, which has been forfeited last year by the
Maryland Taxpayer Services Division:http://www.maryland.gov/click on
Business Database Searches:http://sdatcert3.resiusa.org/UCC-Charter/default.aspx
Of course, the first thing they did was call me and ask me who was this
guy. I just explained he's a sociopath who seems obsessed with me.
They know the status of my businesses. And they know where both
corporations are registered
He really is a sad case. I hope he gets help soon.
I'll hit you back soon Jerry.
I know you miss me, but please be patient.
All in due time.
1
1001 Webs
But you're MAD !!!
Those are Chad's words:
http://groups.google.com.au/group/a...ssible+Flash+Websites&rnum=2#17ab6a70609297dd
That was one of the points I was trying to prove, that he's not the
kind, polite person that he tries to portray himself.
And now you call him a "sociopath" with a "Grandiose Sense of
Self" ?!?
Fine diagnostic you've made there ...
1
1001 Webs
I quote the following paragraph, so dorayme doesn't make another
regrettable diagnostic concerning Chad:
"not only is he a stupid git that does not know when decent advice is
biteing him on the arse!
He clearly has trouble reading as well!. "
http://groups.google.com/group/alt....4853731f29dd?lnk=st&q=stupid#5e104853731f29dd
The line above is a hyperlink, dorayme.
If you click on it, you will get teleported to the offending page ...
D
dE|_
1001 Webs said:
I had a look there and it says nothing about 'sticking with plain old HTML'.
I am quoting your words, you are looking to lay into others to relieve
yourself.
Has your quack diagnosed you as a sociopath yet? Seeing as he advised you to
take it out on Jerry and therefore the whole of Usenet 'if it feels right'
then he sure ain't a good one.
Point 21; Only rarely in difficulty with the law, but seeks out situations
where their tyrannical behavior will be tolerated, condoned, or admired.
---dE|_---
1
1001 Webs
No, you're mad as well.
It's right there, in the same thread.
What's wrong with you people, really?
Again:
It was Jerry and Chad the ones who took it out on me.
For no reason.
And it is absolutely right, using Jerry's words, to "let the World
know", the kind of CRIMINAL he is.
And now who are we talking about?
Law-breaking, Wife-beating, Jerry?
I don't know about you, but I don't think that kind of tyrannical
behavior should be neither tolerated, nor condoned, or admired.
But that's the way I think, not the one you do, obviously.
1
1001 Webs
DISTRICT COURT OF MARYLAND
Case Information
Court System: DISTRICT COURT FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY - CIVIL SYSTEM
Case Number: 0602SP019022003
Claim Type: DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
District/Location Codes: 06 / 02
Filing Date: 07/08/2003
Case Status: CLOSED
Complaint, Judgment, and Related Persons Information
(Each Complaint, Hearing, Judgment is listed separately, along with
each Related Person)
Complaint Information
Complaint No: 001 (STUCKLE, ELIZABETH M) Vs: (STUCKLE, JERRY D )
Type: REGULAR CLAIM
Status Date: 07/09/2003
Filing Date:07/08/2003
Amount $0.00
Last Activity Date: 07/14/2003
Related Person Information
Name: STUCKLE, JERRY D
Connection to Complaint: DEFENDANT
Address: 9920 BRIXTON LANE
City: BETHESDA State:MD Zip Code:20817-0000
Name: STUCKLE, ELIZABETH M
Connection to Complaint: PLAINTIFF
The public access information above is current as of 5:00 PM on
11/11/2007.
The complete case file must be obtained from the District Court in
which the case was last heard.
B
Bone Ur
Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Wed, 14 Nov 2007 20:38:37 GMT
KarlCore scribed:
What a coincidence! In 1991 I assaulted a battery, too, but then found out
it was really the bulb the whole time. Small world...
KarlCore scribed:
What a coincidence! In 1991 I assaulted a battery, too, but then found out
it was really the bulb the whole time. Small world...
K
KarlCore
And I hope that like me, you realized the problem could have been
solved differently.
Karl
1
1001 Webs
Only a "man" of your despicable kind would dare to compare a woman to
a battery.
I would really like to find out whether you'd be so frivolous when
faced by someone your size.
B
Bone Ur
Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:48:37
GMT KarlCore scribed:
Sure. As a matter of fact, I bought a hammer and a new flashlight the same
day. <grin>
GMT KarlCore scribed:
Sure. As a matter of fact, I bought a hammer and a new flashlight the same
day. <grin>