C
Chad
I am corresponding with Neumann with my concerns as we write. You
know, he rejects unanswered 97% of Risks submissions and messages, yet
I've had about 30 pieces published, so I don't think I've been
ranting. Maybe that sound is you?
He feels he needs to be fair to the many people who, unaccustomed to
anything but the most overspecialized and narrow material on the job,
think the post was off topic...not computer-related, despite the fact
that you kinda need a computer to destroy a person's reputation
through wikipedia.
I have written him, saying that the problem is this "focus", this over-
specialization, we learn in school, in a dysfunctional educational
system, and in consequence, merely lively prose and research out of
scale with the minimally acceptable is usually considered off topic.
I have said he may publish my email in Risks 26.07 and 26.08.
"Focus" shouldn't mean "ignoring basic decency and respect for
others". But it usually does, doesn't it?
What is so special about Risks?