J
Jedrin
If money was the only motivating factor wouldn't we all want to be
wall street bankers instead ?
wall street bankers instead ?
Hi all,
I am doing a research about motivation in software development, the
most efficient practices to motivate software engineers, their
popularity, etc.
As a part of the research, I am doing an online survey for software
engineers and managers in software development. It takes just several
minutes and filling it is a good opportunity to share your opinion
about the motivation practices being used in the software industry
today: [---]
Strange question; the most efficient motivator of professionals is
money, and money is very popular.
Hi all,
I am doing a research about motivation in software development, the
most efficient practices to motivate software engineers, their
popularity, etc.
As a part of the research, I am doing an online survey for software
engineers and managers in software development. It takes just several
minutes and filling it is a good opportunity to share your opinion
about the motivation practices being used in the software industry
today:http://ask.wizefish.com/en/MotivationSurvey.aspx
Anyone who does the survey and leaves any contacts will be sent the
results.
Also, if someone is running a web site or blog dedicated to any aspect
of software development we can do some link exchange.
Regards,
Stefan Kiryazov
On Feb 5, 11:19 am, Stefan Kiryazov wrote:
Strange question; the most efficient motivator of
professionals is money, and money is very popular.
Whilst people like money, it's not necessary the most
efficient motivator. Developers also like interesting,
challenging, varied work, work with new technologies, flexible
hours, freedom to do what they feel is technically best
without being hampered by management dictat and many other
things.
That said, by definition professionals are, to some extent, in
it for the money. If they were not, they would be amateurs as
I am now. How that is balanced against interesting work,
physical working conditions, status, etc. varies.
Amongst other things. Two of the most important motivaters are
peer approval and admiration, and personal satisfaction with the
results.
MarkusSchaber said:Strange question; the most efficient motivator of professionals isHi all,
I am doing a research about motivation in software development,
the most efficient practices to motivate software engineers,
their popularity, etc.
money, [...]
This was proven wrong by Science. Read Bruce Eckels excellent blog
entries about this topic, he always references relliable sources on
this subject.
Depends.This was proven wrong by Science. Read Bruce Eckels excellent blogI am doing a research about motivation in software development,
the most efficient practices to motivate software engineers,
their popularity, etc.
Strange question; the most efficient motivator of professionals is
money, [...]
entries about this topic, he always references relliable sources on
this subject.
Right now I am primarily motivated by money, or at least the lack of it.
MarkusSchaber said:Hi, Dirk,
Depends.I am doing a research about motivation in software development,
the most efficient practices to motivate software engineers,
their popularity, etc.
Strange question; the most efficient motivator of professionals is
money, [...]
This was proven wrong by Science. Read Bruce Eckels excellent blog
entries about this topic, he always references relliable sources on
this subject.
Right now I am primarily motivated by money, or at least the lack of it.
I won't dispute that money is a motivator, but it is not the most
efficient motivator. The more money you pay, the more you will attract
those developers which are purely after the money, and not the really
good ones. For the latter ones, a certain level on the paycheck is
enough to give attention to fun, excitement, atmosphere and such
factors.
I once joked with an employer that if he paid me twice as much I would
only have to work half as long
Strictly a "professional" is someone who is a member of a professional[...]
That said, by definition professionals are, to some extent, in
it for the money. If they were not, they would be amateurs as
I am now. How that is balanced against interesting work,
physical working conditions, status, etc. varies.
I'm not sure if the word "professional" has the same conotations
in English as it does in French, but from the French meaning, I
don't think you can be truely a "professional" if you're only in
it for the money. "Professional" implies being paid for what
you do, but it also implies a certain degree of personal
standards with regards to quality and such---a "professional"
will take pride in his work.
Malcolm said:Strictly a "professional" is someone who is a member of a professional
body which regulates itself and has the right to control entry to the
profession. For instnace I can't simply buy scalpels and antiseptic
and set myself up as a brain surgeon - I have to go throguh the
British Medical Association before they'll let me chop people up. the
same is true for lawyers, accountants, and some other more obscure
niches.
Most people aren't professionals, and the word has become misused to
mean 'skilled workers with high standards'. Bascially employers want
the advantages of professional status without conferring on their
employees the control that is the natural concomitant.
Computer programmers are rarely professionals in the true sense, but
ususally professional in the bastardised sense of the term.
Malcolm said:Strictly a "professional" is someone who is a member of a professional
body which regulates itself and has the right to control entry to the
profession. For instnace I can't simply buy scalpels and antiseptic
and set myself up as a brain surgeon - I have to go throguh the
British Medical Association before they'll let me chop people up. the
same is true for lawyers, accountants, and some other more obscure
niches.
Most people aren't professionals, and the word has become misused to
mean 'skilled workers with high standards'. Bascially employers want
the advantages of professional status without conferring on their
employees the control that is the natural concomitant.
Computer programmers are rarely professionals in the true sense, but
ususally professional in the bastardised sense of the term.
Ivan said:The 1950's [sic] were totally awesome.
Lew said:Given that nearly nobody gives a perfect working environment, or even
close, money is the primary distinguisher. As a contract worker, I've
seen a few dozen IT workplaces. The grass is never greener. Offer me
twice as much compensation as the other potential employer and my
talents are yours to exploit.
It's not that money is the motivator. The question is leading and
extremely ill cast. I don't depend on anyone else for my motivation.
Money is the decider; it decides whether and where I work. It doesn't
determine how.
To get meaningful answers, the survey would have to ask meaningful
questions.
Malcolm said:Strictly a "professional" is someone who is a member of a professional[...]
I'm not sure if the word "professional" has the same conotationsThat said, by definition professionals are, to some extent, in
it for the money. If they were not, they would be amateurs as
I am now. How that is balanced against interesting work,
physical working conditions, status, etc. varies.
in English as it does in French, but from the French meaning, I
don't think you can be truely a "professional" if you're only in
it for the money. "Professional" implies being paid for what
you do, but it also implies a certain degree of personal
standards with regards to quality and such---a "professional"
will take pride in his work.
body which regulates itself and has the right to control entry to the
profession.
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.