Moving to new form of usenet ideas?

[Lester Zick]

But, in line with your request, here's something pretty simple and,
in keeping with your professed penchant for "science", something you
might enjoy figuring out:

In other words I should change my font to accurately read your stupid
comments?

~v~~

 

[ChairmanOfTheBored]

Wherein Captain Obvious eats his heart out.



~v~~

You're a top posting Usenet retard as well, I see.

 

[ChairmanOfTheBored]

Aw, Captain Obvious, poor, poor, baby. Would snookums like his lil
fuzzy wuzzy teddy bear? You render arbitrary opinions and consider
them abiter dicta incumbent on truth. You're an intellectual whore.

Jeez... grow the **** up, Chuck. You make me want to upchuck.

 

[Michael Press]

465C7552.DFCAE84C%40earthlink.net

Not found on my server,
and not found by the Google Message-ID
look up widget.

 

[Michael Press]

Lester Zick wrote:

[...]

Be careful, or you'll give yourself a hernia while trying to reach
that high.

Patriotism being the last resort of scoundrels.

^^^^^^
refuge

 

[Michael Press]

View in Courier:


10V E1
|
[6470R] R1
|
+----> 0.32V E2
|
[R2]
|
0V


What's the value of R2, in ohms?

Clue:

E1 * R2
E2 = ---------
R1 + R2

Seems a better clue is that the current
through each of R1 and R2 is equal.
Easier algebra.

 

[John Fields]

View in Courier:


10V E1
|
[6470R] R1
|
+----> 0.32V E2
|
[R2]
|
0V


What's the value of R2, in ohms?

Clue:

E1 * R2
E2 = ---------
R1 + R2

Seems a better clue is that the current
through each of R1 and R2 is equal.
Easier algebra.

 

[John Larkin]

I wasn't aware that I'd been doing other than that since I started
knocking down your house of cards.

But, in line with your request, here's something pretty simple and,
in keeping with your professed penchant for "science", something you
might enjoy figuring out:

View in Courier:


10V E1
|
[6470R] R1
|
+----> 0.32V E2
|
[R2]
|
0V


What's the value of R2, in ohms?

Clue:

E1 * R2
E2 = ---------
R1 + R2

Hey, that's way too hard for these guys. I mean, algebra and division
and hurtey stuff like that.

John

 

[John Fields]

But it doesn't explain yours.

---
Well here's the explanation, junior: Whenever I run across nasty
little half-baked juvenile dipshits like you, who have an axe to
grind and want to be slapped around a little, I'm always happy to
oblige, but I always post at a level which I'm sure you'll be able
to comprehend. And, of course, that level falls into the area of
maturity which your pubescent raging hormones force upon you, so I
gauged my target accurately, it seems.

 

[John Fields]

Why don't you explain it to us.

 

[John Fields]

Bitch, bitch, bitch. No pretense involved.

 

[John Fields]

But nothing reflects you.

---
A mirror do.

And my art reflects my life.

A US patent, several articles published in trade journals, a
successful company, and many original free designs posted to USENET
pro bono.

And you?

 

[John Fields]

That's the most you can celebrate?

 

[John Fields]

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:50:00 -0700, ChairmanOfTheBored

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:22:39 -0500, John Fields

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:27:58 -0700, Lester Zick

On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:03:23 -0700, ChairmanOfTheBored

You're a goddamned retard.

I know. I've been meaning to speak to my faculty advisor about it but
much like you he thinks reality is played on a Nintendo GameCube too.

Never owned one, you retarded ****.

Faculty advisor? Can't say as I've owned one either. See, the problem
here, oh Chairman of the dorks, is that in science we prefer to state
definitive rationale for what we say. And despite our appreciation for
your unadorned opinions we find they contribute far more to the anals
of science than its annals.


---
Then you should certainly welcome the contributions.


A big, wooden, splintery NYPD broomstick handle! :-]

Probably more in keeping with your experience.

Shoving them up retarded folks like yours asses till it exits your
mouth?... yeah, sure. I enjoy it.

Opinions and shit have assholes like you in common.

Would you like to make an
appointment?

Bring it on.

 

[ChairmanOfTheBored]

I wasn't aware that I'd been doing other than that since I started
knocking down your house of cards.

But, in line with your request, here's something pretty simple and,
in keeping with your professed penchant for "science", something you
might enjoy figuring out:

View in Courier:


10V E1
|
[6470R] R1
|
+----> 0.32V E2
|
[R2]
|
0V


What's the value of R2, in ohms?

Clue:

E1 * R2
E2 = ---------
R1 + R2

Hey, that's way too hard for these guys. I mean, algebra and division
and hurtey stuff like that.

"hurtey"?

 

[Ironlizard]

On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:09:16 -0700, ChairmanOfTheBored

22:39 -0500, John Fields
03:23 -0700, ChairmanOfTheBored
You're a goddamned retard.
I know. I've been meaning to speak to my faculty advisor about it but
much like you he thinks reality is played on a Nintendo GameCube too.
Never owned one, you retarded ****.
Faculty advisor? Can't say as I've owned one either. See, the problem
here, oh Chairman of the dorks, is that in science we prefer to state
definitive rationale for what we say. And despite our appreciation for
your unadorned opinions we find they contribute far more to the anals
of science than its annals.
---
Then you should certainly welcome the contributions.
A big, wooden, splintery NYPD broomstick handle! :-]
Probably more in keeping with your experience.
Shoving them up retarded folks like yours asses till it exits your
mouth?... yeah, sure. I enjoy it.

Opinions and shit have assholes like you in common.

Bring it on.

Shouldn't this be in alt.flames.cocksuckers? Just curious.

 

[JosephKK]

Lester Zick (e-mail address removed) posted to sci.electronics.design:

What's it matter to science?

Not a damn lick.

I'm here to discuss science and truth
and you and Michael would appear to prefer to discuss Michael's
service record.

Then quit dissing other things that others do and discuss the science
and engineering that they present.

Well bully for you. I'm sure the girls will be impressed. I'm not so
sure science and truth care one way or the other.

Science cares not about other things i may have done or do.

Nothing would seem to matter much to Michael's credibility.

You have your opinion, newcommer. Discuss science and engineering to
build credibility here.

I'm not dissing his previous service, I'm dissing his lack of
perspicacity and real stupidity in trivializing the honorable
service of millions of others by wearing his religion on his
sleeves. I've never found religion or patriotism particularly
accurate criteria of science and truth.

That is not discussing science or engineering either.

Asshole. Why not just go back to your computer and "BabbleOn" some
more and leave science to those capable of it.

Well, you have certainly left no track record of doing science or
engineering here, all we have seen from you is bad mouthing others.

 

[John Fields]

Clever, very clever.

 

[JosephKK]

Lester Zick (e-mail address removed) posted to sci.electronics.design:

And which facts did you have in mind exactly? Yours or someone
elses.

~v~~

The track record of your posts is facts enough.

 

[Lester Zick]

Lester Zick wrote:

[...]

I know. But it's the best I could do at your level.

Be careful, or you'll give yourself a hernia while trying to reach
that high.

Patriotism being the last resort of scoundrels.

^^^^^^
refuge

^^^^^

Even scoundrels need a last resort.

~v~~