newbie question

V

Ville Vainio

Doug> I already stated that I will not mention boo again, to
Doug> comply with Fredrik's wishes and yours. I will refer to

Relax, and go ahead talking about Boo all you want. I for one enjoy
reading about it, and probably many others as well. Some people may
bitch about it, but, well, that's what people do on usenet.

Doug> only. But I will not be intimidated by the likes of Fredrik
Doug> Lundh. Trollers will be held accountable. If it continues

As mentioned elsewhere it's technically not trolling, but rather old
fashioned flaming. Usenet is free-for-all, so people can expect to be
flamed occasionally, often without good reason. It's quite rare in
c.l.py but it happens. Often all you can do is to swallow it, unless
the person in question just lost their temper for a moment and is
willing to apologize. That is not not always the case.
 
M

Michael Hoffman

Erik said:
How bizarre is it that they're trying to "sell" Spry by indicating it
uses the "very best" features of Prothon, given that Prothon was a
failed project?

And Python uses the very best features of ABC. What's your point? ;-)

Not that I've ever even used Prothon, although I thought the way the
implementor dropped it into conversation was non-obnoxious. There could
be a valuable lesson here.
 
F

Fredrik Lundh

Michael said:
And Python uses the very best features of ABC.

did you learn that from reading Python marketing material, or by careful
study of "the history of python"-documents? there is a difference...

</F>
 
I

Istvan Albert

Doug Holton wrote:

The syntax is indeed virtually identical to python. You are yet another
person who has trolled before.
> Do you have financial conflict of interest too like Fredrik?

You'll easily get away by calling me a troll, but trying to make
it look like that the effbot is one, that's just hilarious.

Istvan.
 
L

Luis M. Gonzalez

Fredrik said:
it's the new Boo marketing motto: "have you harrassed a Pythoneer
today?"

Fredrik, I think you're being a little bit injust.
As far as I could see, everythime the word "boo" is typed, some sort of
censorship or plain bashing comes up, and I think this is not fair.

In my case, if some topic or thread is not of my interest, I simply
skip it.
Why don't we all do the same and live in peace? :)

By the way, this is from comp.lang.python home page:
"Pretty much anything Python-related is fair game for discussion, and
the group is even fairly tolerant of off-topic digressions"

Seeing what was going on in this thread, I think that we probably
should delete this part, because this is getting far from "fairly
tolerant".
 
P

Peter Hansen

Luis said:
As far as I could see, everythime the word "boo" is typed, some sort of
censorship or plain bashing comes up, and I think this is not fair.

Luis, your defense of the genial nature of the newsgroup/mailing list
is admirable, and I thank you for it.

I think doing this by defending Doug's postings, however, might weaken
the strength of your position just a little. (Okay, I mean "a lot".)

About the only time the word "boo" _does_ come up, it comes up
in one of Doug's posts, often in an apparent attempt to "help"
a Python newbie by pointing him in a misleading manner to
an entirely different language which just happens to have a syntax
that was inspired by and looks a fair bit like Python's.

Until Doug posted about "virtually identical" (and note he didn't
mention the syntax at the time, thus my wondering if he meant
the whole language), I had never noticed him or Boo. Yes, in
spite of all the past postings. I look at postings by newbies
and try to help; I rarely look carefully at the other replies,
and if I ever saw a "there's also this thing called Boo" post,
I suspect I just mentally blanked out of disinterest and moved on.

As a result of all the activity in the "Boo who?" thread, however,
I went and searched a bit to find out who this Doug character is.
It turns out that he's been mentioning Boo in postings *to newbies*
repeatedly over the last few months. These are people trying
to use Python, having a question or difficulty about it, and he
launches into a sales job about some other language.

Would you defend someone who came into this group and responded
(admittedly helpfully, sometimes, in other ways) to newbie
questions by constantly saying "you can do this much more easily
in Perl of course, see www.perl.codehaus.org"? I think you'd
find that after the first few posts like that, it was getting
tedious. Then downright offensive. And yet Perl has more in
common with Python than Boo does!

What Doug has been doing is like standing at the door of
a mission run by a church and trying to redirect those coming
for help to a different church down the street, with promises
that the meals are better. And when one of the volunteers comes
out and looks offended, he turns on them and accuses them
of religious persecution, and being unfriendly to boot.
By the way, this is from comp.lang.python home page:
"Pretty much anything Python-related is fair game for discussion, and
the group is even fairly tolerant of off-topic digressions"

Boo is not Python related. It's that simple. Boo has some
passing resemblance to Python, and claims that it's much
more than that are patently false. And clearly designed
to be marketing propaganda to get more Boo users onboard.
I wouldn't have seen this with only one or two posts by Doug,
but after reviewing his recent posting history I can only
say that I'm actually appalled at his gall in the matter.
Seeing what was going on in this thread, I think that we probably
should delete this part, because this is getting far from "fairly
tolerant".

I believe the definition of "fairly tolerant" doesn't necessarily
imply total tolerance of all topics under any circumstances.
(And I know you didn't mean that.)

If Doug wants to come in from time to time and mention Boo,
however, he's welcome to do so. (And no, I'm not a moderator,
I just get one opinion, like everybody else.) He might get
a few people questioning Boo's merits each time, but that's
par for the course. If he doesn't like the heat, he can stay
out of the kitchen. More likely, if he can accept such posts,
or ignore them, he'll be making his point, marketing his pet
language, and making a few converts.

If, on the other hand, he keeps jumping on newbies, who I
imagine are often overwhelmed by Python as it is, and who
just want an answer to their one simple question, and he
shouts "Boo" at them all the time, then the rest of us are
going to feel both offended that he's standing on our corner
where we're trying to help people, and worried that he's
misrepresenting Boo to Python newbies and confusing them
even more than they might already be. Doug: move on,
there's another street corner just down thataway, and
it's called comp.lang.boo. Or the Boo mailing list or
your own blog or something.

I could go on, but that's enough of a rant as it is. Luis,
I have appreciated reading your thoughtful and caring words
on this whole subject, and I understand your point of view.
I just don't share it in this instance and wanted to get
this off my chest. Thanks for listening. :)

-Peter
 
R

Roger Binns

C

Carlos Ribeiro

Let me say it again then, although I do not know why it threatens people
so much: the syntax of boo is indeed virtually identical to python's.
That is what I said and what is clear from the website.

Doug,

Boo seems to be interesting, and that's despite your insistence. If it
is "virtually identical" or not is largely besides the point. Of
course, you have to right the say it, as your personal opinion,
whenever you wish.
I already stated that I will not mention boo again, to comply with
Fredrik's wishes and yours. I will refer to CPython, and CPython only.
But I will not be intimidated by the likes of Fredrik Lundh. Trollers
will be held accountable. If it continues at this pace, then I suggest
a weekly troll alert, to educate and prepare the so-called newbies for
the behavior that occurs on this list.

At this point you crossed the line, and it was not even a fine one. It
is largely off the mark. First, because having "trollers" (sic) to be
accountable is not possible - unfortunately. But also, because nobody
is intimidating you. More than once people have tried to call you to
reason, and you keep bashing people here quite gratuitously.

Doug: If anyone is fearing debate here, is you. Disagreement is
natural. Be prepared for it, specially if you want to spend time
evangelizing people on how great Boo is.

And, as Aahz has pointed out before, please don't be afraid of spam
and insert a real email address so we can at least direct our
responses to you.

--
Carlos Ribeiro
Consultoria em Projetos
blog: http://rascunhosrotos.blogspot.com
blog: http://pythonnotes.blogspot.com
mail: (e-mail address removed)
mail: (e-mail address removed)
 
L

Luis M. Gonzalez

Peter,

Thank you for taking the time to reply in such a detailed and polite
way.
I'm satisfied by your last post and, although I beg to disagree in a
few points, I'm glad to see that we are all slowly going back to a
civil way of expressing ourselves.

Regarding my first post in this thread, I hope I didn't offend you. I
just wanted to point out that there were some attitudes from you and
from others that, in my oppinion, were a little bit too harsh.
Sometimes it seems that instead of replying, you are making absolute
statements intended to disqualify other people's oppinions, leaving no
place for a continuing discussion of these matters.
But I want to say that I recognize your labor here when it comes to
help newbies and the time you spend in this list particicipating and
contributing.
And I also recognize that you are capable of "slowing down" and make
your thoughts clear.

As for your comment about Boo:
Boo is not Python related. It's that simple. Boo has some
passing resemblance to Python, and claims that it's much
more than that are patently false. And clearly designed
to be marketing propaganda to get more Boo users onboard

Perhaps I don't measure that relativity with the same ruler, but as far
as I could see when playing with Boo, it is very similar to Python.
Anyway, I don't want to appear as a promoter or evangelist of Boo, I'm
just someone who tested it and liked it.

Also, you should consider that, preferences aside, there might be
pythonistas in situations where they are forced to work with Microsoft
technologies, and since programmers use tools (and we are discussing
about tools here, not religions) I think it's pertinent to discuss it
here.
Amyway, I wouldn't want to use this list to talk about Boo, because I
think that the best place to do it is comp.lang.boo.
However, since I think it is definetely python related (I know you
disagree, but others don't) I see no harm in mentioning it here
occasionally.

regards,
Luis
 
D

Doug Holton

Fredrik said:
"have you harrassed a Pythoneer today?"

</F>

Yes, you have. I'll ask again that you stop. Just because you make a
living in part off of a CPython module, doesn't mean we cannot discuss
python-related things on this list, or discuss things from the
perspective of a python user, or suggest alternative solutions when
someone asks for a feature that Python does not have.
 
F

Fredrik Lundh

Fredrik said:
I suggest you do your homework, and post an apology. Immediately.

oh, never mind. someone who has the necessary insights, and that I respect,
has just apologized for your behaviour.

</F>
 
P

Peter Hansen

A.M. Kuchling said:
<rolls eyes> Soon it will be possible to become a well-known programmer
without writing any code at all; just issue grandiose manifestos and plans
until everyone is suitably impressed.

It's very interesting what message you see if you click on
the "Next Message" link five times starting in the above
message.

-Peter
 
T

Thomas Heller

A.M. Kuchling said:
<rolls eyes> Soon it will be possible to become a well-known programmer
without writing any code at all; just issue grandiose manifestos and plans
until everyone is suitably impressed.

I hope that I'm retired then.

Thomas
 
A

Alan Kennedy

[Roger Binns]
[A.M. Kuchling]
<rolls eyes> Soon it will be possible to become a well-known programmer
without writing any code at all; just issue grandiose manifestos and plans
until everyone is suitably impressed.

Well, things are getting better then .....

It used to be that grandiose manifestos and suitably impressive plans
were all you needed to make billions through a stock flotation ;-)

<0.5 wink>-ly y'rs,
 
E

Erik Max Francis

Michael said:
And Python uses the very best features of ABC. What's your point? ;-)

Not that I've ever even used Prothon, although I thought the way the
implementor dropped it into conversation was non-obnoxious. There could
be a valuable lesson here.

I'm not talking about the way the implementor "dropped it into
conversation," I'm talking about the way the language is beyond sold.
The blurb on the Web site mentions this as a selling point, and as a
subtitle for "The Spry Computer Language":

http://spry-lang.org/

Certainly Python mentions ABC in background information on where Python
comes from. But Python doesn't mention this as the first sentence in
describing what its virtues are!
 
G

Grant Edwards

How bizarre is it that they're trying to "sell" Spry by indicating it
uses the "very best" features of Prothon, given that Prothon was a
failed project?

That seems to imply that you think market sucess == technical
merits. Unless you mean that Prothon was a technical failure
rather than a market-share failure...
 
E

Erik Max Francis

Grant said:
That seems to imply that you think market sucess == technical
merits. Unless you mean that Prothon was a technical failure
rather than a market-share failure...

Since it was clearly both, I'm not sure why you're making this false
dichotomy.

Trying to sell Spry, Pycs, or whatever its name is this week as being
inspired by Prothon, a project that failed in every possible way there
it to fail, doesn't impress anybody -- technically, marketing-wise, or
any other criteria.
 
J

Jarek Zgoda

Fredrik said:
(and by the way, comp.lang.python isn't "the community". most python pro-
grammers are elsewhere, and will only read what we post when googling for
the answer to some specific problem...)

They are busy writing programs in Python, some of them even do it for
the money, 9 AM - 5 PM. And specific problems they encounter are driving
Python development (in most cases).
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
474,222
Messages
2,571,142
Members
47,757
Latest member
PDIJaclyn

Latest Threads

Top